Good Day
I configured my RB435g with RouterOs 6.9 and wireless NV2 protocol in my laboratory.
The goal is obtain the highest Throughput.
So I ask what are the best settings in NV2 protocol and what is the maximun Throughput can i get?
currently i obtain 110 Mb/s in full duplex
thank you
Depending on signal on both ends, S/N ratio on both ends, CCQ on both ends. Type of traffic and packet lenght. One or two (or three) chains? HT settings etc. etc.
Many variables to play with in fine tuning your link. Not a ‘one solution’ works all. You have to understand what wireless is, how it works and what all the variables can have an impact on the througput.
But rough guideline: Defaut setting with dual chain antennas (properly hor + vert pol aligned) and good signal and low noise condition is usually giving good results…
Good luck! 
Thank you for your reply can I ask you what is the highest throughput with nv2 that You have obtained and with which configuration?
thanks
Hello,
Can i ask you, which type of RB you have? Maybe it would help us to predict the highest throupghput with given hw
Look at this, is with other device but is still the same
In dutch but follow the printscreens that i made
http://www.wirelessinfo.be/index.php/mikrotik/pages/omnitikpp
Every link has needs its own settings. So it is hard to give examples.
A good rule of thumb is the following;
Take the highest stable connection rate the link can achieve. (300Mbp on dual chain 40Mhz channel)
Devide the 300 by 2 for two way traffic, or take 80/20 for one way traffic. (Because tcp downlaod needs also upload and v.v.)
Take another 10% of overhead.
If CCQ is not 100% in both directions, take also a percentage off relative to the CCQ level. (50% CCQ means that roughly 50% of all packages send by the transmitter are not received by the receiver (or corrupt) and have to be send again. So 50% CCQ means 50% less throughput of raw radio data (=data+overhead).
In real life it means that on a good 40Mhz 100% CCQ link a max tcp througputt can be reached of around 200Mb real data througputt.
udp traffic can be higher.
I have some links were indeed I can reach such, or close to such, througputts… in P2P scenario.
Have 2 stations talking to one AP and the speed is already further decreased. Up to yet again a 50% of the sum of all calcs made above!
Hence it can be possible that with many clients using lots of data on one ‘n’ + nv2 AP speeds might go down to only 5-10Mbs even if the connection rates might show the max and CCQ is good…
Hope this helps…
So, is there any market for MT in Belgium and Holland? I am Dutch from origin and know that both our countries are basically 100% covered with either G3/G4 and most urban areas also have wide spread adsl/cable or nowadays even fibre?
Maybe in Belgium the East part of the country? But ubnt and MT must be having a niche market at best???
(Anders gezegd, is er brood te verdienen in Nederland en België met MT gebaseerde netwerken?)