Im put a new CCR2004 in place an older CCR1009. I upgraded the CCR1009 to 7.8, then exported the CMD config and pasted it into the CCR2004
That seemed to work, but I noticed the BGP was not advertising my /32 IP address locally into my network, as it had been doing in 6.x. I then grouped them into a /28 and added that, still wont advertise, then I created a /24 subnet, nope. Basically it will not advertise any new subnets, I rebooted, no success. Then I created a new output filter address list in it for one of the BGP connections, changed the connection to point to the new address list and it wont use it, it is still using the default bgp-networks. What can I do to fix this?
If I disable a BGP connection, it doesnt get removed from the winbox sessions, but if I look in the terminal window /routing/bgp/session/pr I can see that it is not connected. Is it really this bad in 7.x?
with your explanation no one can help u.
export your config
Im not sure how my config is going to help these issues,. The BGP sessions not removing for the winbox is not a config setting.
How can I show that changing the Output Network and the Advertised subnets didnt change ?
How can I show in my config that it is not advertising subnets?
but here is my config for 1 BGP connection
add as=65526 cisco-vpls-nlri-len-fmt=auto-bits connect=yes disabled=no hold-time=30s keepalive-time=1m listen=yes local.role=ebgp name=MissionSprings output.default-originate=if-installed
.network=MS-networks remote.address=10.100.0.214/32 .as=65527 .port=179 .ttl=1 router-id=10.100.0.210 routing-table=main templates=default
here are the subnet that will not advertise
add address=172.20.186.176/28 list=bgp-networks
add address=172.20.186.192/30 list=bgp-networks
add address=172.20.187.0/24 list=bgp-networks
[admin@BonnyDoonHS] /routing/bgp/advertisements> pr where dst=172.20.186.176/28
[admin@BonnyDoonHS] /routing/bgp/advertisements> pr where dst=172.20.186.192/30
[admin@BonnyDoonHS] /routing/bgp/advertisements> pr where dst=172.20.187.0/24
[admin@BonnyDoonHS] /routing/bgp/advertisements>
but as I said, it will not advertise ANY new subnets that I add
@surfnet,
one simple fact: RouterOS v7 is not RouterOS v6.
You can’t import the configuration from v6 to v7 and expect it to work,
even the rest of the things no longer work as you used to, and many are not finished.
RouterOS v7 still doesn’t do everything v6 did.
I did not import from 6.x to 7.x
I upgraded ros 6 to ros 7 on the old router, then I exported the ROS 7 config
got new router, upgraded package to match, then imported the config via the terminal window.
And on previous CCR1009 upgraded to v7 work? You test it?
The CCR1009 was working in the field, I did not upgrade it to 7.x in the field, we backed it up, installed on new CCR1009, upgraded to 7, then exported config , import in CCR2004, Could not do full BGP test on the bench. I installed it in the field, all appeared to work. the BGP was connected and the routes were being advertised . I later noticed that none of the /32 routes were being advertised. I figured maybe 7.x doesnt advertise /32 routes. So I made them into a /28, removed the /32. Still it wont advertise the /28. I then created a /24 route and it wont advertise that. It will not advertise any new subnets I create. I have rebooted, and last night I upgraded from 7.8 to 7.9, no change it will not advertise any new subnets I create.,\
Do not start topic with wrong assumption/title because you are unable to configure the device.
[offtopic]
The backup is for same device, same software, at least must be used the exported .rsc
[/offtopic]
So the discussion is closed.
What is written in post #5 continues to be valid,
and your objections are completely useless.
Read the instruction provided from @mrz or post the WORKING BGP configuration of the CCR1009 that use v6, for help on conversion.
The relevant parts, if you do not have complex setup (like OSPF, etc.) are only the export of /routing bgp and /routing filter
you are not understanding me, I did not backup/restore. I used terminal Export.
I exported the relevant settings, the used the terminal to import them
for instance
/routing bgp connection
add cisco-vpls-nlri-len-fmt=auto-bits connect=yes hold-time=2m input.filter=Redwood_in keepalive-time=1m listen=yes local.role=ebgp name=RedwoodEstates output.filter-chain=Redwood_out remote.address=10.100.0.209 .as=65509 .port=179 templates=default
/routing filter rule
add chain=Redwood_in disabled=no rule=“if (dst == 0.0.0.0/0) { set bgp-weight 130; }”
add chain=Redwood_out disabled=no rule=“if (dst == 10.100.0.208/30) { reject; }”
/routing bgp template
set default as=65526 disabled=no output.network=bgp-networks router-id=10.100.0.210
/ip firewall address-list
add address=162.251.185.20 list=bgp-networks
add address=172.20.186.182 list=bgp-networks
add address=172.20.186.183 list=bgp-networks
add address=172.20.186.187 list=bgp-networks
add address=172.20.186.188 list=bgp-networks
add address=172.20.186.189 list=bgp-networks
add address=172.20.186.190 list=bgp-networks
and you don’t understand me.
so?
read previous post, I do not request v7 export, but the WORKING v6 export of WORKING CCR1009…
I Upgraded the CCR1009 to 7.8 before exporting it, so I have no 6.x export.
I have a backup of the ros6 , are you asking me to downgrade the CCR1009 to 6, restore the backup, export and post it here?
just to close this loop with actual feedback and help
I went online facebook MK group and posed the exact same question as I did here. Within 10min I got the answer
Maybe this can help
In v7 it is not possible to turn off synchronization with IGP routes (the network will be advertised only if the corresponding IGP route is present in the routing table).
I was DST-Natting these IPs so they were not in the routing table. I added 1 IP from the subnet to the router, and then the subnet started advertising.
this is interesting
i am who answered your question on Facebook Group
Both questions are very similar but that little changes you made in Facebook post made me much easier to spot your issue
while here i watched the topic and did not catch it
PD: the topic title does not helped
well, I was pretty upset when I wrote the topic, this still doesn’t answer why the session does not get removed in winbox gui, but in the terminal I can see that it has been removed. Nor does it answer the question of why when I change the output filter to a different Address list it does not change the routes being sent
Hit F5 to refresh the winbox table.
In 20 years of using winbox I have never had to hit f5
20 years ago v7 do not exist.
lol, so the new ros 7 needs us to manually refresh winbox? what an awesome upgrade
There is still no feature parity with v6, and they insist on adding more without fixing what is already there…
Machines now, both Routers and PCs are more powerful than 2007,
why now everything is slower in winbox, there are refresh problems, you can’t see the announcements in the BGP,
the BGP filter log is written in hexadecimal and you don’t understand a thing…
It just makes it worse. And then for what?..