i have made a pppoe server by bonding interface, where ether2 and ether 3 is slaves and mode is round robin algorithm.
My problem is when i use Raspppoe to get service, Now i get 4 services. Before bonding i always got 2 services.
Do you need PPPoE server which works on two interfaces ?
Perhaps it’s much better to create bridge between interface Ether2 and Ether3 and run PPPoE server.
I’m not sure it’s correct configuration to setup PPPoE server on bonding interface.
Thnxs, Sergejs. i need better performance coz i have 700 pppoe clients and in pick hour bandwidth uses more than 35Mb. I thought it will balance the bandwidth between two interfaces & will deliver higher throughput.
Can u plz try to help me, how will i make bridge between 2 interfaces???
Thnxs,
raktim
Sergejs,
I have made bridge in one of my router as a test basis. Here My pppoe server interface is “bridge1”, and lan1 & lan2 is bridge ports.
//if i keep two uplink (like bonding) from lan1 & lan2 to client’s switch, pppoe server is not working,
//if i keep one uplink(lan1) it’s working, but bandwidth is not pass through in lan2
Can u plz give some idea???
thnxs,
raktim
Bonding doesn’t sound as correct solution for these scenario.
One interface can handle 35Mbps without any problems, perhaps you don’t need to create any bridge/bonding/load-balancing and run PPPoE on single interface.