Bridge filter counters incrementing but packets not dropped

I have four Routerboards in the following configuration:

                                 
                 |----AP-TEST  < . . . . . . . . >FIXED-SUB (station) 
TEST-SERVER------|  (ap bridge)< . . . . . . . . >ROGUE-SUB (station)
(GW & DHCP)      |


[Routerboards are in CAPS, ethernet links are DASHES, radio links are PERIODS]
  • WDS is not enabled.
  • The TEST-SERVER is running as a DHCP server.
  • The AP-TEST box wireless interface is a VAP and is bridged to the ethernet interface.
  • The AP-TEST box is set up as a DHCP-Relay, relaying requests to the TEST-SERVER.
  • The ROGUE-SUB has a rogue dhcp server attached.
  • The FIXED-SUB has a WinXP PC attached, and is the DHCP client.

I am attempting to block rogue DHCP servers from running on the network, and have implemented the following bridge filter:

/ interface bridge filter 
add chain=forward in-interface=fixed1 out-interface=fixed1 in-bridge=bridge1 \
    mac-protocol=ip src-port=67 ip-protocol=udp action=drop comment="" \
    disabled=no

When using the ‘Repair’ button to grab an address for the WinXP machine, I see the packet counters increment for my bridge filter rule:

[admin@AP-TEST] > interface bridge filter print forward stats                  
Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic 
 #   CHAIN      ACTION      BYTES           PACKETS        
 0   forward    drop        6336            11

But the packets are not dropped. The DHCP request succeeds and the rogue DHCP server serves an address to the WinXP machine. I have verified this using a sniffer. Interestingly, the source MAC address for the DHCP replies is that of the ROGUE-SUB box and not the rogue DHCP server itself. I do not have proxy-arp enabled on any interface.

I have also tried using the ‘input’ chain and other variations, but get the same result; counters increment, but packets are still forwarded to the other station. FYI when I disconnect the rogue server, the WinXP machine gets its address from the TEST-SERVER.

Is there something fundamentally flawed in my setup?

Regards,

Tom

default-forwarding must be disabled for this to work, otherwise subs have direct, unhindered access to eachother (packets are automatically repeated by radiocard without ap softwares knowledge).