Bridge interface or Static route?

RouterOS General
1

hello, a time ago I made a question how to make subnetworks in routerboard with different interfaces since my isp gives a class to me /26, Never works with interfaces in way bridge thus is my first experience and not if I am doing it well. What I did was to create an interface Bridge that contains the following interfaces (Public(eth1), eth2, eth3, eth4, eth5, eth6) all this was for being able to create subnetworks /29 /30, Since as to implement them of estatic form. I notice that the behavior is not very stable, is better made statics routes for this case?

My isp give my de default route of the /26 class and i need to create subnetworks. ofcourse i need to make static routes to work properly but i try and it dont work, i making some wrong in this. The problem is that router is now working for my clients but not very good. i want to reconfigure this.

Any sugestion?

Thanks
Gustavo

2

Is it necessary to use bridge mode ? In this case you can use VLANs in the local interface connecting that interface to a Trunk port in any managed switch.

Regards.

Faton

3

The problem is all the switchs are only vlan port, no vlan tag.

But my question is how can i make static routes to the subnetworks without bridge interface?

Thanks for your reply

Gustavo

4

Can you describe a bit or post a graphic of how your topology looks like, and I can give you some examples. I have a lot of routing in my network.

Regards.

Faton