Bridge question on RB433

[prawira]

Hi all,

I got difficulty with bridge on RB433. Already try ROS 3.15, 3.18, 3.20, 3.22; all of them giving the same result.

the steps are :

• set the ip address if ether1 to 192.168.101.30/26
• add bridge with name bridge1, ports=ether1, ether2, ether3 and wlan1
• interface wlan1 act as station connected to AP (192.168.101.1/26)

from terminal (except ros 3.15), I can ping the AP for 10 lines only and then rto.
from my pc with ip 192.168.101.31/26 connected to ether1, I can not ping to AP.
if the ip of my pc configure as dhcp client, I can get an IP from AP but can not ping the AP.

Any clues for this problem ?

Cheers

Paul

[Chupaka]

wlan mode should be pseudobridge

[prawira]

Thx Chupaka.

It works fine..

Next question.. but still within the same subject.

If I put another minipci on wlan2 and put it into bridge1 too, what is the mode shoud I assign ? bridge or ap bridge or ??

Cheers

Paul

[Chupaka]

still pseudobridge

@Documentation

station-pseudobridge - wireless station that can be put in bridge. MAC NAT is performed on all traffic sent over the wireless interface, so that it look like coming from the station’s MAC address regardless of the actual sender (the standard does not allow station to send packets with different MAC address from its own). Reverse translation (when replies arrive from the AP to the pseudobridge station) is based on the ARP table. Non-IP protocols are being sent to the default MAC address (the last MAC address, which the station has received a non-IP packet from). That means that if there is more than one client that uses non-IP protocols (for example, PPPoE) behind the station, none of them will be able to work correctly

[Aug]

Unless it’s acting as an access point

[Chupaka]

@prawira

If I put another minipci on wlan2 and put it into bridge1 too