I m facing problem while bridging Two interfaces(ether1+ether1)Bridge1 20.20.1.1.
ethernet1 ip - 192.168.1.2
ethernet2ip - 192.168.1.3
Ether1 is connected to ADSL NAT Server via hub
ADSL NAT Server Ip -192.168.1.1
Gateway - 192.168.1.1
Dns - 192.168.1.1
Ether2 is connected to Client Pc
ip address- 192.168.1.10
gateway - 192.168.1.1
dns-192.168.1.1
I can ping adsl server ip(192.168.1.1) And Client ip(192.168.1.10) from Winbox..but i cannot ping adsl server ip from Client PC.
I dont think there is any need of route because i m using bridge setup.
When using bridge (i.e. bridging ether1 and ether2), you should add IP address ONLY on bridge interface. You don’t even have to have IP address for the bridge to be working . But no IP address should be configured on ether1 and ether2 .
Then you can diagnose - check ping from the computer to the gateway, check arping if possible (or check, if computer gets arp entry for 192.168.1.1), check /interface bridge host (if MAC addresses of the computer and the gateway are visible on the bridge) - and you can run sniffer on ether1 or ether2 - to see, where the problem is (where the packets are lost).
I m using Bridge network and now i want to migrate to routed network.
Our server has a ip range of 203.xx.xx35 to 203.xx.xx.94 with bridge network our clients uses 203.xx.xx.38, 39, 40, 47 till 203.xx.xx.94 to connect to internet.
Now i want Client 10.10.1.10 can access 203.xx.xx.65, client 10.10.1.12 can aceess 203.xx.xx.67, Client 10.10.1.15 can access 203.xx.xx.78.
How can i do this via routing?
. But no IP address should be configured on ether1 and ether2