Dear all
I have a customer need a lot of vlan connect to routeros, just about 1000 of vlan.
I try to add 1000 vlan to interface , but after i finished, i close winbox, and reconnect to
routeros with winbox, i open the interface, i can’t see any interface. but if i use console connect to the system, using print command , i can see all the interface is still there.
Does this a realy bug?
Thank you for the report, we will try to fix it.
thank u very much, i am waiting for that~!
I am doing the same thing (>800 VLANS) and found the same problem with version 3RC1
Upgrading to version 3RC2 fixes that problem 100% - also a problem with updating the hostlist in Bridges seem fixed.
I am posting elsewhere to ask for others experience with performance using >800 VLAN’s in >800 bridges with >800 simple queues on Xeon based 2,4GHz processor running MT version 3RC2
I really need to be able to do that to make my life better 
/Niels
800 simple queues is not recommended as packets that go through queue list are all matched against all the queues and that will bring a lot of latency, if it is possible - create groups with same speeds
How do you create groups? Is this in the docs or wiki?
PCQ allows you to set the same bandwidth limit to the multiple users,
IP firewall address-list allows you to decrease multiple mangle rules to few ones,
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/PCQ_Examples
we have more then 800 simple queue created by the radius reply attribute.
I would like to explore the possibility to use pcq but I have to atay with radius.
So what is your advice about it?
Regards
Ros
As far as I know, it is not possible to make automatic PCQ queue creation with RADIUS.
any workaround for this?
I mean any solution to use pcq to avvoide a large number of simple queue for the people who use radius pppoe customers’ authentication?
regards
Ros
for each PPPoE customer you can assign static ip adress (that will be given out by pppoe server) and in address lists group customers and use these address-lists to create simple-queues with limitations
Place these queues before HotSpot dynamic queues, however I’m not able to imagine, what is the sence of PCQ and HotSpot dynamic queues,
as most likely PCQ queues are going to limit/equalize all customers traffic, however HotSpot dynamic queues are designed to limit each customer separately.
As ‘queue simple’ are working in the way, when order is important for rule, traffic is accepted and remove from the queue, when it matches one of the queues, in other words there will be no traffic for dynamic HotSpot queues.
i was thinking that he disable hotspot restrictions, and that way only queues with PCQ are left
it seems not so great idea after all