I have this situation in a working network without vlans (ignore the text on the right top corner, that is the desired state)
In the router I have one the default bridge where both the ethernet ports as the hardware wireless interfacess are attached to. I also have a virtual access point on another subnet for guests, and I firewalled the lan bridge and the wifi subnet they are isolated. A few years later, I added the additional access point which is hanging from an access router placed in the attic, no guest virtual access point in the CAPS. No especial setting
I now want to properly segment the network with vlans, so my question is: in order to use the access point, do I need to connect it to a trunk port on the cisco access switch where all the necessary vlans I want to use?
So for my internet provider I have vlan6 for internet, and vlan4 for tv. I have another vlan for guest devices, and I have already tested (I have another mikrotik for testing when the family is not around, so I can switch the router) downstairs and that is working. If I connect the access point to the access point on with a trunk port on the switch, will it work? Apologies if this is a trivial question, but before I mess with the internet access of the teenagers, I need some confirmation .
So I have this now (the cisco switch is out of the picture now, after an erase it will not come back online so I replaced it with a netgear GS105Ev2 I had somewhere).
On the netgear, I have a trunk port on interface one and the rest of the interfaces are untagged vlan6. I have connected the caps mikrotik on port 3 of the netgear, started on caps mode and I see it acquires an ip adress from the dhcp server listening on the br-vlan6 interface.
I can connect from the router to the access point using mac telnet.
On my mobile I see the new ssid dd-wrt-5g-test appear, and I can login with the password, but It does not get an ip address, giving up and using one of the apipa ones.
I am obviously missing something, but I cannot figure it out. Any help appreciated
well, every time I have tried that I have locked myself out of the router, so I basically have given up on that. Using these vlan settings is more understandable to me. Are there any undesirable side effects of configuring the vlans like this?
So I got it working by removing the vlan configuration on the datapath. The port is untagged, so it is not necessary to tag it on the datapath. And now it works, great speed.
I added an input acl to allow connections from one ether port directly, so this is not an issue any more . I do miss a console port on this, for the rest, very nice applicances.