CCR2216 CPU UNBALANCED LOAD AFFECTING TRAFFIC

[chechito]

i think you must return to ccr1072, usually newer platforms take months to optimize

plus
a new operating system version
plus
a new hardware architecture
plus
a new hardware offload using ASICs

because of all this concurrent aggravating factors we can expect this process to be even more difficult than ever and i have no doubt MikroTik is doing all its effort to achieve sucess but it will take time

i think we are seeing the starting point of a new era for MikroTik Routers, but we will not transit it without pain

just remember how much time it took ccr1036 form its starting point, then how much for ccr1072 to reach its current state of performance and stability

if your requeriments are at the edge of what MikroTik can do today i dont think you can rely on waiting to improve until you reach the limit again and again unless you are decided to suffer for own will

[Network5]

Hi,
I suppose that this problem is still active?

I have the same problem with 7.14.2 on CCR2216.

[krixer]

@infabo

@infabo

I am starting to believe that cpu high utilization is from the ROSv7.

I pushed 6Gig through CCR1072 with ROSv6 and CPU was around the 1-2%.
I did same on CCR1072 with ROSv7.7 and CPU started shooting up, individual cores hitting about 70%
with CPU temperature hitting 66C. I think the CCR2216 CPU problem has to do with the ROSv7.

Is there a way to downgrade the CCR2216 to ROSV6 ??

what you are using this data traffic recorded?

[Apachez]

@anav

i think you must return to ccr1072, usually newer platforms take months to optimize

plus
a new operating system version
plus
a new hardware architecture
plus
a new hardware offload using ASICs

because of all this concurrent aggravating factors we can expect this process to be even more difficult than ever and i have no doubt MikroTik is doing all its effort to achieve sucess but it will take time

i think we are seeing the starting point of a new era for MikroTik Routers, but we will not transit it without pain

just remember how much time it took ccr1036 form its starting point, then how much for ccr1072 to reach its current state of performance and stability

if your requeriments are at the edge of what MikroTik can do today i dont think you can rely on waiting to improve until you reach the limit again and again unless you are decided to suffer for own will

Thats just BS. Any device released to the public should already be “optimized”.

[merkkg]

September 2024 and this issue still present

[clambert]

The performance of the CCR2116 for MPLS traffic is really disappointing. I guess that for the CCR2216 it must be even worse, considering the price of the device.

[nz_monkey]

Has anyone logged tickets about this issue with Mikrotik support ?

And if so, What did they say ?


This seems like a fundamental oversight on Mikrotik’s part that MPLS performance is so poor in RouterOS v7.

[merkkg]

I have logged a support ticket for this but still waiting for response.

The sad part is we have 15 x CCR2216 in the field that I’m begging for a solution to.

Mikrotik doesnt have any other options for me to move to and to change vendor means completely configuration rebuild, testing, etc.

PLEASE CAN MIKROTIK PRIORTIZE THIS

[clambert]

I generated a ticket more than a month and a half ago, and I still haven’t received a response.

[merkkg]

I will run a beta in production if I have too… to fix this issue.