ChatGPT and bing WAN Failover did anyone do it right?

RouterOS General
1

I asked them both to create a config for dual WAN both using DHCP also use Google for monitoring WAN, did anyone do it better or get it right?

ChatGPT

/ip dhcp-client
add interface=ether1 disabled=no

/ip dhcp-client
add interface=ether2 disabled=no

/ip route
add dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 gateway=ether1 distance=1 check-gateway=ping
add dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 gateway=ether2 distance=2 check-gateway=ping

/ip firewall mangle
add action=mark-connection chain=input connection-state=new in-interface=ether1 new-connection-mark=wan1_conn
add action=mark-connection chain=input connection-state=new in-interface=ether2 new-connection-mark=wan2_conn
add action=mark-routing chain=output connection-mark=wan1_conn new-routing-mark=to_wan1
add action=mark-routing chain=output connection-mark=wan2_conn new-routing-mark=to_wan2

/ip firewall nat
add action=masquerade chain=srcnat out-interface=ether1
add action=masquerade chain=srcnat out-interface=ether2

/ip dns
set servers=8.8.8.8,8.8.4.4

/ip dns monitoring
add address=8.8.8.8 disabled=no interval=10s probe-count=2 timeout=2s

/ip route rule
add action=lookup-only-in-table dst-address=8.8.8.8/32 lookup-table=wan1_check
add action=lookup-only-in-table dst-address=8.8.8.8/32 lookup-table=wan2_check

/ip route rule
add action=lookup table=wan1_check
add action=lookup table=wan2_check

/ip route
add distance=1 gateway=ether1 routing-mark=to_wan1
add distance=2 gateway=ether2 routing-mark=to_wan2

bing

Create routing tables for each WAN

/routing table add name=to_WAN1 fib
/routing table add name=to_WAN2 fib

Mark connections and routes for each WAN

/ip firewall mangle
add chain=output connection-state=new connection-mark=no-mark action=mark-connection new-connection-mark=WAN1_conn out-interface=ether1
add chain=output connection-mark=WAN1_conn action=mark-routing new-routing-mark=to_WAN1 out-interface=ether1
add chain=output connection-state=new connection-mark=no-mark action=mark-connection new-connection-mark=WAN2_conn out-interface=ether2
add chain=output connection-mark=WAN2_conn action=mark-routing new-routing-mark=to_WAN2 out-interface=ether2

Masquerade traffic from each WAN

/ip firewall nat
add chain=srcnat action=masquerade out-interface=ether1
add chain=srcnat action=masquerade out-interface=ether2

Add Google DNS servers as destination addresses with scope 10

/ip route
add dst-address=8.8.8.8 scope=10 gateway=ether1
add dst-address=8.8.4.4 scope=10 gateway=ether2

Add recursive routes for each WAN with check-gateway ping and target-scope 11

/ip route
add distance=1 gateway=8.8.8.8 routing-table=to_WAN1 target-scope=11 check-gateway=ping
add distance=2 gateway=8.8.4.4 routing-table=to_WAN1 target-scope=11 check-gateway=ping
add distance=1 gateway=8.8.4.4 routing-table=to_WAN2 target-scope=11 check-gateway=

2

Ask ChatGPT, why are you asking us?
Go have a chat with the bot…

3

?

4

Translation error: why are you asking us?


Already the first lines are full of bullshit, without checking the rest…

But didn’t you understand that ChatGPT & Co. are just bullshit that SHAMELESSLY LIE just to give you a sop?

5

Thanks for your info.
Apologies, if anyone was offended, was not my intention.

6

If you search are present dozen of topics with dual wan failover, already working, without involving ChatSOP…

7

Thanks will look for it :smiley:

8

You do realize that the cat is an AI bot programmed to show varying degrees of consternation with any post purporting to concern chat gpt.
Its rather clever, almost human like.

9

_Cat_GPT: @anav detected