Find the “Fail” see image…
Focus on power supply and free space…
I also have 2 CCR1036-12G-4S…
also i have found a nice Feature…
Klick on Interfaces on Winbox, Press [STG] + [A] and then [STG] + [D]
Nice Easter EGG i tried out on my Production CCR 
Feature request:
2 SFP
48 Port Ethernet
Nice try on disabling all the interfaces. That should get a few people.
This function should be disabled!
It costs us years of our’s life!
its the reason why most of the reader are not replying… they are offline and call me “bastard” ^^
2 SFP? your wish may be fulfilled sooner than you expect…
i removed the board, and found a place for the 2nd SFP. it’s even printed on the pcb’s backside.
the SFP’s place is currently occupied by the micro-usb socket.
if you look close, you can spot the solder pads for the SFP socket’s connectors.
Good info.
I hope that this version will see soon - CRS125-24G-2S
is there anywhere a manual for the switch section?
I cant find anything about it…
We have some basics here: http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:CRS_examples
More features will be added in next RouterOS releases, as the hardware supports a lot.
hy,
now i have changed the switch itself to customer_vid and crackt it…
reset takes no effect… using ROS 6.5
serial gives me ▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ back…
Normis: very nice features, BUT i see no option for bonding!!!
If I would like to use bonding, i have to use the CPU for that feature, and i’m not sure, that it can handle bonding of multiple gbps.
I would be please to have a feature of bonding like assigning “slave” ports to a master.
For example:
bonding1: ether1, ether2
bonding2: ether3, ether4
bonding3: ether5, ether6
if they can be a switch group, that’s an extra. so the members of switch group can communicate with 2gbps with each other.
(that can really good for servers and NAS, or uplink)
thanks!
Any updates on Bonding issue?
Please contact support, or make a new topic about bonding. This isn’t the place that many people will see your question.
Finally got to see one…
Initial impressions… AWESOME job on:
Not so much on the PSU… external wall wart? Really? Why not use an internal PSU like you did on the CCR and RB1100?
Still no love for the single GigE interface to the CPU. Fortunately, I’m putting this on a network that only has a 6Mbit/s internet connection, so no performance issues expected.
On the SFP, put it on it’s own GigE lane to the CPU. Add a 2nd SFP and a couple GigE ports, all with separate lanes.
-Troy
troy: this is a real SWITCH with routerOS features addon. Why the hell do you need more then a gbps connection to the CPU (what cannot handle more than few hundred megs)?
Think about a managed gigabit switch plus a dual port mikrotik router - in one box (ok it offers more, but not expect too much…)
It would be more accurate to say it’s a switch with a SINGLE port MT router. All traffic in/out of the CPU (router) is restricted to a single GigE interface. That means that when traffic is routed between Ether1 and Ether2, it’s moving on a shared resource. Putting dedicated uplink ports on dedicated GigE lanes would improve Layer-3 performance dramatically, though never a full gigabit since the CPU still wouldn’t be able to handle it.
With regards to performance, if a PPC could get Layer-3 to wire speed, it would probably be well worth the increased cost.
The bottom line for me, is that for the money, this unit is hands-down the best anyone can ask for, but that doesn’t mean that the development of this device wasn’t short sighted or that there’s no room for improvement.