Can’t find the new E50UG hEX on the Mikrotik routerboard website. The link in the YouTube video has a brochure (https://mt.lv/hex_october) but it’s a bit sparse.
It is an upcoming product.
the info are detailed in the PDF.
There is also a YT video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zrzq_zPWoQ4
Maggio, you should know better that pdf is useless as it doesnt denote the 512 byte information which is closest to real world performance.
Extrapolating from the 1518 numbers my guestimate with filter rules, the throughput should be in the order of 500Mbps, basically still not a 1 gig ISP contender.
It appears what has occurred is increasing the power/CPU of the hex series so it acutally matches closer to the very original original hex performance which was reduced when switching to RoS7.
The increased RAM will help overall performance. Also being an ARM64 CPU will open up more RoS applications… ( like Wireguard!! etc.)
I’m pretty sure the difference in performance is more in line with what they claim then your estimations 
BTW You could run wireguard on Hex since the start of ROS7… even on SXT LTE which has MIPSBE platform. (I know since I used those 2 devices in 2021 for a VPN link using Wireguard to vacation home in France)
What is now possible with this new version is Zerotier and BTH.
That’s where I got the PDF as I mentioned in the opening post.
I’m with @anav here. The difference in test results between 512byte packets and 1518byte packets on some recent ARM devices (e.g. L009 or RB5009) is around 3-fold (PPS tends to remain almost constant) and we all know how test results relate to reality. So it’s reasonable to expect around 500Mbps of real-life routing throughput from the new device. Which is actually not bad for a very versatile router with MSRP of $60.
Another very sad thing about the new device: it has passive PoE-in with input voltage range of 12V-28V. MT really should move to 802.3 PoE-in …
On the other hand, it has 128MB storage! We will be able to partition it! YAY! 
Yeah and you loose the sd card interface.
Thanks, for the clarification!! You trust MT Claims/fantasies, more than my facts ?? No maple syrup for you this Christmas, will send your bottle to MKX.
Next will be the improved hex S?
We need the sfp port and better ipsec performance, although I don’t think the improvement will be significant.
I can’t find any information on the Dual-Core EN7562CT 950 MHz Soc used in the E50UG. The raw CPU speed isn’t significantly faster than the Dual-Core 880 MHz MT7621A in the RB750Gr3, but clock speed isn’t necessarily a good indication of work rate.
Software support is the question here. I will be surprised if the bridge on the E50UG will be HW assisted and vlan aware as it is on the RB750Gr3 with v7.
Viktors downplays the importance of the “switching” feature in the video https://youtu.be/Zrzq_zPWoQ4?t=134 and at https://youtu.be/Zrzq_zPWoQ4?t=171 he says “the result, that depending on the config, we’ve seen performance even twice as fast”.
So I will wait until more real world testing has been done to see whether this is really a drop in replacement for an RB750Gr3. Probably for most cases, the E50UG will be faster, but I will guess that there will be special cases where the RB750Gr3 will be a better choice.
I was really surprised that the increased non-volatile storage wasn’t even mentioned in the video. I consider that to be a major advantage; the 16MB in the RB750Gr3 is too small for V7 if you want to load many packages.
Other things apparently missing from the E50UG vs the RB750Gr3 are the microSD slot and beeper.
E50UG pros vs RB750Gr3
Twice the RAM (512MB vs 256MB)
8 times the the non-volatile storage. (128MB NAND vs 16MB FLASH)
ARM64 vs MMIPS 32bit architecture (this is primarily a more features available thing, ZeroTier and BTH)
E50UG cons vs RB750Gr3
New SOC that may have limited support at least at first. Software may not be optimized as much as with older chips.
Switch support probably limited, probably will not support HW assisted bridging or vlans. So if that’s an important feature, you may want to look at an additional external vlan-aware switch, but then there are probably better router choices (like the hAP AX^2 although it is also more expensive than the E50UG)
No microSD slot
No beeper
Looking at the PDF, there is one thing that worries me:
They declare this:
Max power consumption without attachments 4 W
Max power consumption 10 W
So far, so good. But the power supply sent with the device (as stated on the PDF) is one 24V 0,38A! If I’m not mistaken, it would have a limit of 9,12 W! This isn’t even enough to power the declared maximum usage.
True, it isn’t being sold yet. They may very well sell it with a 24V 0,5A power supply, and problem solved. But as of now, the matched power supply can’t power it at 100% usage.
Mikrotik team,
When can we expect this new device to appear on your Web site with complete specs, block diagram and test results?
Any idea when it will become available for purchase?
Thank you
Reducing the range (the current hEX and many older products support 8-30V) makes it useless for sites with 12V float-charged lead-acid batteries which vary from 13.8V down to around 10.5-11V low voltage cutoff where the Mikrotik is powered directly off the battery to monitor the voltage. To handle 12V or 24V float-charged setups the range needs to be 10-28V.
There are similar gripes with other devices which do support 802.3af/at (e.g. RB5009, L009) as they state 24-57V, the minimum on a 24V float-charged setup is around 21-22V.
Aargh, no beeper?!? I am actually using the beeper/feeper for other people to stage hEXen ‘blind’, where the beeps and feeps indicate the stage and success or failure of the staging.
I noticed that too! It seems like the main website hasn’t been updated yet with the new E50UG hEX, which is a bit annoying. I saw that brochure from the video, but it’s pretty barebones. I’ve had some luck in the past checking with distributors directly when stuff like this happens, since they sometimes get the details earlier than the website. Probably worth keeping an eye there.
These external power supply adapters are most common failure point of Mikrotik hardware. When devices with 24V 0,8A/1,2A adapters suddenly fall offline then first thing is to get spare adapter along before going to check out the status on site. For many years these have been the culprit for over 90% of these failure situations.
Yes I know that they are much cheaper than devices itself, but resolving these failures will cost more in labour than the cost of the adapter. These Mikrotik 800/1200mA adapters are officially sold for about 9€. It would be the time stop cutting costs on these.
P. S. It does not matter whether adapter is newer or older design. Both of them are prone to fail and most oftenly they are found dead after external power outages…
This is a great point.
Do all MT devices use the same adapters (hEX, AC, AX, RB, etc.)?
If not, is there a chart of which adapters work for which devices?
Are you that lazy?? Checking the plain old hex…
…
…
Rules of thumb:
- voltage (dc output of adapter) must be an exact match for device input voltage ( or within the stated range if one is provided )
- amperage (current) provided by adapter must be equal to or greater than expected device current input.
- Polarity must match: Most common is centre positive.
- (THANKS MKX) → Plug Diameter: 5.5mm outside and 2mm inside diameter, female, pin positive plug, accepts 8-30V DC