Hello.
I have this scenario:
2 mikrotik routers A and B.
A eth1 192.168.0.1/24; A wlan1 192.168.1.1/24
B eth1 192.168.0.2/24; B wlan1 192.168.2.1/24
wlan interfaces of A and B are dhcp servers. A serves 192.168.1.0/24 pool and B serves 192.168.2.0/24 pool.
I would like to setup clients C,D,E… wireless connected to A or B with minimum setup.
When everything is working C,D,E… can ping lan side of A or B and A or B can ping lan side of C,D… Is a routed setup, not bridged.
The problem is:
I have client C and is able to connect to A or B, if C is connected to A, it receives dynamic address 192.168.1.2/24 and default route 0.0.0.0/0 gw 192.168.1.1 for example. That is ok but, if the lan side of client C must be reacheable (not NAT) from A or B, i need to add a static routes at mikrotik A with temporary dynamic ip address of C (192.168.1.2) as gateway. The problem is that tomorow C client could be connected to B and old static route would be invalid and a new one is needed. It can be dificult to keep up to date with several clients. I tried with rip also but it did not work. I checked the rip config and i think that it is ok, i setup connected networks, redistribute connected, only v2 of rip. I tested several times but if did not work.
Can someone tell me if exists a way to have this scenario running with minimum static setup?
It will be perfect that C could connect to A with no need to specify static routes by hand and it should be possible to disconnect from A and connect to B and have ip connectivity from side to side.
The idea is to have several final clients configured more or less the same way (different lan network) but same wireless setup with both connection options A or B for all of them.
Can someone help?
Thank you all.