Different LAN VS VLAN solution

Hi,
As I said in one of my previous threads, I removed an interface from the bridge, set an IP for it in a different subnet than my bridge. I added the IP and its subnet to my mikrotik’s address list tab. I also create a DHCP server on it. Ok, it makes its job and fits my needs at the moment at least, but I was wondering, out of curiosity, which solution between mine above and setting VLANS on a Mikrotik is better in terms of speed and efficiency.
Thanks

As one of your LANs is connected to dingle interface, then whatever RB roes with it is routing. And whrn it comes to routing, there is no difference between your current config and VLAN-based config. The only benefit of using VLANs would be when multipke LAN segments shared same physical infrastructure (cables, switches) …

So, it wouldn’t make sense to change setup and adopt a VLAN solution in my case.
Thanks