Thanks. I’ll give it a closer look out of curiosity, but at first sight, it looks over-complicated for a small problem. I might as well use a Greasemonkey script in the browser.
Winbox and Webfig have the same amount of menus. Winbox is simply more stable, faster and works even if there is no IP. So it is not more complicated, it is only more reliable.
Personally I think that personalization of the web interface through branding and skin, together with a sensible user management is a useful resource.
I can imagine many use cases when you might want to give to some users access to the router with a simplified menu and without having them download and run winbox.
I know it is not wise from a security viewpoint, still it may be useful, though the procedure seems to be particularly complex (for “branding”), surely it is not worth it for such a minor nuisance as the pre-filled “admin”.
Also Winbox crashes when trying to open large script (35KB), Winbox64 running with wine-8.0.1 (WineskinCX 23.7.1), attached log. winbox_crash.log (4.83 KB)