Could you also test VPN performance ( ipsec and openvpn ) ??
It is interesting too see the CPU% when doing this 500Mbps.
Either way the results are not astonishing.
I expect that you will see no more 30Mbps IPsec md5/aes, and no more than 10-15Mbps OpenVPN sha1/aes.
Based on this spec, Cisco RV130W only provide 802.11n but it can provide 50Mbps IPSec VPN throughput ? It has more powerful CPU compare with hAP ac ?
Yes. Can you describe more in detail VPN config and methodology tests?
About VPN config, please see wiki http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:TOC
Test case:
- Site to Site
- Remote client access for mobile and PC device ( show network speed for before VPN connect and after VPN connected ) Please use this website for speed test http://www.speedtest.net
I’m saying that after what I see when using the OpenVPN on TP-Link Archer C7 (the same HW). The crypto engine is the same (fully software), it will not go any faster.
9Mbps TCP UL, OpenVPN on OpenWrt CC, BF-CBC-128bit/SHA1 (one of the fastest combinations), CPU: 75%
Which wireless router can provide 50~100 Mbps throughput for OpenVPN ?
The CCR series routers. The 1100AHx2 (the pre-CCR flagship). And once the hardware crypto works (I don’t know if it does already), the RB3011 series should be able to reach this as well.
RB3011 will not have hw encryption support enabled in ROSv6.
HW encryption works only with Ipsec.
That’s good to know. Is hardware encryption for IPSec already enabled form the RB3011, or are you still working on that?
1100AHx2 and RB3011 are not wireless router !! 
I can’t do it. My internet connection too slow for that.
Seems like the wireless ac performance is CPU limited in any case. Is this with fast path active and connection tracking disabled?
You should get pretty decent performance with this: https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/turris-omnia-hi-performance-open-source-router. It looks like a best router, maybe it doesn’t have the awesomeness of RouterOS, but it’s definitely more beefy in every terms. The WRT1900ACS appears to use the same CPU and here they show that it reaches 10-12MB/s: http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/wireless/wireless-reviews/32856-linksys-wrt1900acs-dual-band-gigabit-router-reviewed?showall=&start=1. I kind of believe that, because this MIPS processors are pretty weak.
And here too: https://airvpn.org/topic/11827-routers-with-aes-256-cbc-acceleration/ (look at the bottom). So if you want the best VPN performance get the Turris Omnia.
Test 1: 10-12MB/s
Test 2: 97mbit/s
Why it has more different between two testing ?? If WRT1900ACS can get 97mbit/s for OVPN, I will consider to buy it. Who can confirm that testing???
12MB/s = 96Mb/s - they are reporting roughly the same speed, just in different terms. Windows always shows MBytes instead of Mbits because it defaults to storage terms and not network terms.
I see. Thanks your explanation!
I only concern about wireless router with VPN performance (OPVN and IPSEC).
Based on these result, WRT1900ACS is better for me ( not hAP ac ) ??
On hAP AC you will get around 10-15Mbps (The OpenVPN performance is limited by CPU), On Turris/1900ACS you will get around 90Mbps. I would wait for Turris, because this is the router with open source design and with open source software.
Yes, the numbers 10-12MB/s and 97Mbps are roughly the same. One is in Megabytes the second is in Megabits.
Any testing or review engineering sample for Turris Omnia ?
Fast path enabled and connection tracking set to auto.
In tools::profile cpu load looks like:
wireless ~ 85%
ethernet ~ 10%
Overclocking is not available in 6.34.1 firmware. I hope, we will have this possibility in the future.