Come on, it is not a problem isn’t it? It displays an error when export encounters this particular item but other than that it works fine.
It is merely a cosmetic issue during normal use.
It is correct, not a mistake, but in a new core installation with 2 Mikrotik top router does not give the best image that nothing else export tells you that something is not right.
I use stable tree, no it’s good idea use release candidate for router in production:
[admin@MikroTik] > /system package print
Flags: X - disabled
# NAME VERSION SCHEDULED
0 routeros-tile 6.40.2
1 system 6.40.2
2 ipv6 6.40.2
3 X wireless 6.40.2
4 X hotspot 6.40.2
5 dhcp 6.40.2
6 mpls 6.40.2
7 routing 6.40.2
8 ppp 6.40.2
9 security 6.40.2
10 advanced-tools 6.40.2
[admin@MikroTik] > /system routerboard print
routerboard: yes
model: CCR1072-1G-8S+
serial-number: 727206XXXXXX
firmware-type: tilegx
factory-firmware: 3.33
current-firmware: 3.39
upgrade-firmware: 3.39
[admin@MikroTik] > /system routerboard mode-button print
error - contact MikroTik support and send a supout file (2)
[admin@MikroTik] >
Hello,
This issue is already fixed in the latest 6.41rc version of RouterOS.
Please use the “check for updates” button in your configuration interface to upgrade.
It tells me to put an RC version for a core in production?
Please post the REAL PROBLEM that you have with it.
There is no point in going on and on about a cosmetic problem that has been fixed in a future release candidate.
You are free to choose between installing that release candidate or keeping the current stable version.