Every day at 22pm all links down

Every day all active links down :frowning: I listed all scheduled tasks, but can’t found any in this time.
May be this is ISP joke, but why all links down? Any ideas?

nov/24 22:00:11 interface,info wan link down
nov/24 22:00:11 interface,info box link down
nov/24 22:00:11 interface,info rodos link down
nov/24 22:00:11 interface,info oops link down
nov/24 22:00:11 dhcp,info dhcp-client on wan lost IP address xx.37.184.187 - lease stopped locally
nov/24 22:00:14 interface,info box link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
nov/24 22:00:14 interface,info rodos link up (speed 10M, half duplex)
nov/24 22:00:14 e-mail,error Error sending e-mail <Main DHCP alert!>: DNS resolve failed
nov/24 22:00:15 interface,info wan link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
nov/24 22:00:15 interface,info oops link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
nov/24 22:00:15 dhcp,info dhcp-client on wan got IP address xx.37.184.187
nov/24 22:00:17 dhcp,info dhcp deassigned 192.168.88.2 from xx:xx:CA:05:08:17
nov/24 22:00:17 dhcp,info dhcps assigned 192.168.88.2 to xx:xx:CA:05:08:17
nov/24 22:00:18 dhcp,info dhcp deassigned 192.168.88.70 from xx:xx:2B:36:82:92
nov/24 22:00:18 dhcp,info dhcps assigned 192.168.88.70 to xx:xx:xx:36:82:92

Sorry,

       routerboard: yes
             model: RouterBOARD 3011UiAS
  factory-firmware: 3.41
  current-firmware: 6.45.7
  upgrade-firmware: 6.45.7

Alert is script on DHCP client…

As I inverstigated, it’s all interfaces on one (first) switch.
Can wan link disconnection propagated to all other links?

Normally not, one port going down doesn’t affect others. But maybe there is some broadcast storm and it causes the switch to go completely down for a while - it’s just a speculation.

May be this is watchdog? Can it down links, not reboot?

Definitely not, watchdog reboots the whole machine when it stops giving it treats (because it is dead). There is no watchdog for a single switch chip unless they’ve silently added it recently, and if they did, you’d see it in the log.

Is it feasible for you to migrate the cables from ether1-5 to ether6-10 one-by-one to see whether the issue is related to one of them, or rather the traffic coming from that cable?