Feature Request: IPerf

efaden · November 24, 2014, 2:34am

Would be great to have an iperf compatible server/client on mikrotik.

-Eric

jaykay2342 · November 25, 2014, 6:39pm

+1 would be a nice feature. I like iperf, do all my tests with it

marrold · November 25, 2014, 8:26pm

+1

mmario · January 20, 2015, 4:23am

this would be great

jarda · January 20, 2015, 7:27am

I agree.

nuskope · January 20, 2015, 12:28pm

I agree…

+1

nimbo78 · January 20, 2015, 7:57pm

+1
very usefull in big provider networks

Arcee · January 20, 2015, 9:45pm

+1
Current bandwidth test feature seems very basic.

ibm · January 20, 2015, 10:01pm

+1

PastuhMedvedey · January 21, 2015, 11:48am

+1

doush · January 21, 2015, 12:59pm

Yes thats what we need

+1

awacenter · January 22, 2015, 10:44am

+1. It is a good idea.

exa · February 11, 2015, 8:13am

+1

Oh please.

Or add jitter/latency and similar stats to bandwidth test. I guess iperf compatibility is easier.

mietus · February 11, 2015, 11:43am

+1

pukkita · February 16, 2015, 8:35pm

+1, have wished a lot of times to have it…

realtime · February 18, 2015, 3:16pm

good idea! +1 too!
very useful tool, can test link quality with any other server

class889 · February 19, 2015, 10:23am

i’d love that as well !

mcdebugger · February 19, 2015, 6:17pm

+1 for IPerf. As addition to previous purposes: it’s good to test wireless link from mobile running iperf client/server. And of course to test bandwidth between pc box and mikrotik.

alexjhart · February 23, 2015, 12:53am

This would be great to have for sure, especially being able to specify number of parallel client threads to run.

ScottReed · March 11, 2015, 4:30pm

This would be a welcome addition.

+1