The longest cable run is about 3M. Shielded cable everywhere.
The pole is made of steel, and is grounded aswell.
The weak link looks really to be the rb750 (Not even shielded jacks), the input protection circuitry was not loaded (vs rb750UP). It uses the same processor as Ubnt’s M stuff (Not famous for ethernet rugedness).
Unfortunatelly it was the 5 port switch we had in hands. I am asking to see if someone already field-proven a board to be more resistant to 100mhz interference.
Do you use kit power supply or PoE-injector? I think you can try to ground minus (-) of power jack or ground Routerboard directly (http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Grounding). I don’t sure minus is grounded on the board, maybe some one should confirm that, or just check it with tester.
I`m going to run the ethernet cables into steel tubes, and try to star-ground everything to a point in the box (wich is in the pole. there is no ethernet cables longer than 3m.).
Still, what RB has the most resilient ethernet ports?
rb333 looks promising, as ethernets are individually handled, EMI from all cables should not mux in a single controller.
Problem is we need all 5 ports..
Cat7 may be a solution, but is very hard to find.
I tried to make a drawing of the situation. Anyway, my point is, which routerboard is better suited for an high-rf environment?