This should be easy, but every setup I have tried doesn’t seem to work.
I have two class C public subnets and I am trying pass some public IP’s along to my clients.
I am currently using the 1:1 NAT methodology, and it is working…for now.
I am seeing more and more requests to be removed from the 1:1 nat solution and be given full public IP addresses.
I have searched around the forums and have not really found a suitable answer. Can anybody provide a link or example?
Thanks,
McFrosty
gmsmstr
December 28, 2007, 5:49pm
2
This really depends on your configuration. proxy-arp may help, but not a good solution personally. This may be a question for a MT consultant http://www.mikrotik.com/consultants.html
triac
December 30, 2007, 12:20pm
3
Hi McFrosty, Proxy-arp in my PPPoE server work fine! Add IP-pool of your public address range to customer profile
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx example: create pool: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[xxx@PPPoE Server] ip pool> add name=pool_1 range=88.xxx.xxx.100-88.xxx.xxx.200
[xxx@PPPoE Server] ip pool>
[xxx@PPPoE Server] ip pool> print
NAME RANGES
0 pool_1 88.xxx.xxx.10-88.xxx.xxx.250
[xxx@PPPoE Server] ip pool>
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Add pool to profile xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[xxx@PPPoE Server] ppp profile>add 0 remote-address=pool_1
(where "0" is the number of your actual customer profile).
[xxx@PPPoE Server] ppp profile>
[xxx@PPPoE Server] ppp profile> print
Flags: * - default
0 name="profile PPPoE" local-address=1x.xx.x0.5 remote-address=pool_1
use-compression=default use-vj-compression=default use-encryption=required
only-one=default change-tcp-mss=default
[xx@PPPoE Server] ppp profile>
xxxxxxxxxxxxx Enable Proxy-arp on WAN port xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[xxx@PPPoE Server] interface ethernet> set WAN PORT NUMBER arp=proxy-arp
[xxx@PPPoE Server] interface ethernet>
VERY IMPORTANT!!!
Masquerade NAT rule MUST be disabled!!!!
Try!!
Paolo
PS: TNX to CMIT, he have explained me these settings some time ago!
---Dennis... che schifo! Il forum non serve per far soldi ma per condividere esperienze! VERGOGNA!