have mikrotik any device that can aggregate 10G?

Hardware MikroTik hardware general
1

have mikrotik any device that can aggregate 10G?

i have 3 links

  1. 800 mb\s (1G link)
  2. 300 mb\s (1G link)
  3. 250 mb\s (1G link)

all via fiber

i want aggregate all of this link to upstream link in 10G\s

have you any device for this purpose?

2

Deleted because not related.

3

maybe i didn’t checked market properly, but only SFP+ modules can have 10Gbps and above, speeds :[
ports agregation wasn’t bad idea too, cause router switch really fast, but that wasn’t get you 10Gbps, but can[with two 1Gbps interface left after you connect media-converters]at least - temporally serve you :=)

4

10G fiber line
/
mikrotik
/

  • server1 - lan1
  • server2 - lan2
  • server3 - lan3

LAN or WAN links?

quest is to use 1 wan connection for 3 independent lans
with announcing BGP


If you build an LAG with three 1 GB LAN ports, either they are SFP or copper based, you will get only an aggregated
3 GBit/s Link Aggregation Group! Not more and not less.

to my core come 1 fiber uplink!!! Now each lan have its own wan uplink. But profitable will be using 1 wan

The only one (device) that will be able to do so (hardware based) is named above, it is the CCR series, but I don´t know if the LAG is implemented in RouterOS v6.xx right now.

For sure that we don´t misunderstand us both, I am also really interested to have a MikroTik device that offers
those things like real LAG, SSTP, DSTP, RSTP for building one fat pipe! But it is more then I was telling some lines
above it must also implemented in RouterOS also.

my idea is using 1 fat pipe.
but i dont know will ccr series support 10G gbic modules?

in those document http://routerboard.com/pdf/401/CCR1036-12G-4S_web.pdf
SFP Four 1.25G Ethernet SFP cage (Mini-GBIC; SFP module not included)

SFP+ perhaps? not supported???

for my needs using mikrotik better than to switch dell or cisco

p.s. sorry for my mistakes

5

SFP+ is currently not supported in any RouterBOARD devices. Maybe in future products.
You can consider an X86 system, where you can use SFP+ devices.

6

Any timeline when SFP+ will come?

7

Deleted because not related.

8

Hi

since the CCRs don’t support SFP+ at the moment, I would use a Brocade CER 2024F or 2024C with a dual 10Gig Module. It’s a 65Mpps device (hardware routing) and would do the job nicely. Though it’s much more expensive than a CCR but it’s a very good device and at least it costs less than a Cisco.

If your budget is limited, a x86 System is the way to go.

  • Mat
9

Deleted because not related.

10

Hey, why so rude…? I didn’t say that a CCR will never be as good as a CER or something. I love the CCRs and I’m sure they will outperform a lot of the “big” routers on the market.

But we are talking about the current CCR and “lexlvivs” need for SFP+. Not what could be available at some time in the future or about some CCR Model out of a fairy tale (sorry a had to). And the truth is that the current CCR doesn’t support SFP+. If it does in the future it will be quite on par (ow better) with other more expensive routers.

  • Mat
11

I don’t think he was rude, he was just asking for ideas for a future model.

Currently no RouterBOARD device has SFP+ capable ports, but we will have them in future products. Most SFP+ modules you can use in CCR, but it will work at 1.25G speed (the modules are backwards compatible).

12

Show this one,


http://shop.meconet.de/Systeme-Embedded/MikroTik/19-Zoll-Systeme/meconet-High-Performance-Router-HPR-1156-6GC::115816.html

and

http://shop.meconet.de/Hardware-Einzelteile/Netzwerkkarten/PCI-Express/4-Port-PCI-Express-Gigabit-NIC-4-SFP::115530.html

and this 10G SFP

http://shop.meconet.de/Hardware-Einzelteile/Netzwerkkarten/SFP-Module/Finisar-FTLX1471D3BCL-10-GB-Sek-SFP-Modul::115838.html

13

If he was rude or just a bit unfriendly is a matter of taste. Swiss and Germans have different views of that but let’s go back on topic.

He statet that a imaginary device which may be available in the future is better for the current needs of a user, which sounds a bit strange to me.
But the links in his last post about the x86 system are great.

  • Mat
14

Deleted because not related.

15

Perhaps it was more related to my poor English language skills, it was sounding rude, but not in the meaning of mine.

Or maybe my english skills… I didn’t even understand everything in your last post :confused: Anyway. I think everything related to this topic is said.