Device is L009UiGS-RM
All ports are in the bridge1 except ETH1 which is WAN. Basically default router configuration as from factory.
I would like to leave ETH2-ETH5 in the bridge. ETH7 and ETH8 to be for second user, ETH8 for third user
Should I remove them from the bridge and make second bridge with ETH7 and ETH8 or I read some say VLAN is the better way for doing this?
Two extra DHCP-s can be created, but fixed IP is also OK for this scenario.
All users have to have access through ETH1 WAN and firewall to the web, and they need to be isolated from each other for all protocols (screencasts and similar things). Bridge1 should be able to access Mikrotik devices which are connected to those ports, for management.
Can you write me the simplest config that would achieve this? Thanks.
Disagree…
ether1 should NOT be part of the bridge ports or related settings, its WAN and nothing to do with bridge.
On the other subject.
when you create /interface bridge port for access ports and enter the PVID, the router dynamically includes the required untagging on corresponding /interface bridge vlan config lines.
However, this can lead to a lack of understanding of how to setup /interface bridge vlan.
In your case bridge ports should be /interface bridge port
add bridge=bridge1 ingress-filtering=yes frame-types=admit-only-priority-and untagged interface=ether2 pvid=10
add bridge=bridge1 ingress-filtering=yes frame-types=admit-only-priority-and untagged interface=ether3 pvid=10
add bridge=bridge1 ingress-filtering=yes frame-types=admit-only-priority-and untagged interface=ether4 pvid=10
add bridge=bridge1 ingress-filtering=yes frame-types=admit-only-priority-and untagged interface=ether5 pvid=10
add bridge=bridge1 ingress-filtering=yes frame-types=admit-only-priority-and untagged interface=ether6 pvid=20
add bridge=bridge1 ingress-filtering=yes frame-types=admit-only-priority-and untagged interface=ether7 pvid=20
add bridge=bridge1 ingress-filtering=yes frame-types=admit-only-priority-and untagged interface=ether8 pvid=30