I’m planning to bridge our buildings as following:
A <–~1km–> B <–~2km–> C
Where’s: A & C as follow…
RB-133C + NMP3602 + 24 dBi Grid (Station mode+IPSec VPN client)
And B:
RB-532A + CM9 + 15dBi Omni (AP mode+IPSec VPN server [effectively handle 2 VPN tunnels])
The traffic would be daily transaction data and occasionally streaming surveillance camera (A->B, C->B).
From what I’ve read, it seems the RB-133C would not be (powerful) enough for this purpose. Am I right? If so, then if I changed all the routerboard to RB-532A, would it work fine or do I really need PC for VPN?
Really appreciate any opinions.
RB500 should be fast enough. I would use Rootenna.
Cabling ethernet is much easier than coax.
Price difference to RB-133 is not worth to think about
it for a company-link.
Unfortunately, it was already over budget with just 2 sets of RB-133+appropriate antenna. I didnt realized the diff-in-price between 100 and 500 series is large (for the company anyway). So the RB-133s will be on hand for testing and setting up.