Hello,
I am currently using a MikroTik wAPR-2nD as a remote antenna.
The IP Passthrough feature allows me to forward the public IP address received on the antenna to a Cisco router connected behind it (WAN interface).
Behavior observed in version 7.14.2
The Cisco router correctly receives a public IP address through passthrough.
However, it is assigned with a /8 subnet mask (45.0.0.0/8).
As a result, the Cisco router considers the entire 45.0.0.0/8 range as directly connected:
C 45.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0/0.10
This prevents communication with other addresses within the same public range, since the router tries to reach them locally.
It is worth noting that the supervision (management) IP configured on the Cisco remains reachable from the Internet (via the route provided by the ISP), indicating that the MikroTik properly forwards traffic to the Cisco router.
Behavior observed in version 7.20.2
The subnet mask issue has been fixed:
C 45.X.X.X/29 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0/0.10
L 45.X.X.X/32 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0/0.10
However, the Cisco management IP is no longer reachable from the Internet.
A packet capture on the Cisco shows that traffic to this IP never reaches the router, meaning it no longer passes through the wAPR-2nD.
I did not notice any configuration changes during the upgrade from version 7.14.2 to 7.20.2, nor did I make any manual modifications that could explain this behavior.
Additional information
-
The firewall rules on the wAPR-2nD were not modified between the two versions.
-
As a precaution, I also disabled the firewall completely (using a permit any any rule), but the issue persisted.
-
The problem therefore seems related to the Passthrough behavior in version 7.20.2, which no longer correctly forwards all incoming traffic destined for the Cisco router.
-
My routing is fully functional, as everything works correctly in version 7.14.2.
-
The issue appears to have been present since the LTE updates prior to version 7.20.2.
Has anyone experienced a similar issue or found a workaround for this behavior?
Thank you in advance for your help.