I was wondering if 16MB onboard flash is enough for normal router functioning?
I generally use the usual set, dns, dhcp, routing, etc + CAPsMan and usage graphing.
Thanks
I was wondering if 16MB onboard flash is enough for normal router functioning?
I generally use the usual set, dns, dhcp, routing, etc + CAPsMan and usage graphing.
Thanks
If you want to using firewall, 16 mb is not enough
Sent from my SM-A705FN using Tapatalk
What kind of configuration would eat out memory?
I’d say nothing from you list requires extra flash space, perhaps except graphing. But even graphing does not usually occupy too much of a disk space. So, if a particular router model satisfies you requirements otherwise, flash size should not really be an issue.
Thanks, that’s what I presumed.
Do you happen to know if graphing engine truncate old data it collects to reduce DB size? hour/day/week/month… - If I set graphing, will 16 mb suffice for years to come?
Graphing engine truncates and averages data:
For any given graph there will be at most 1362 data points stored at any time. For a modest router with some 17 physical and logical interfaces and queues and (I’m assuming here) using 32-bit counters that means around 110kB storage used. If 64-bit counters were used, storage size would be twice as much.
Actually the range of all above mentioned graphs is wider than I described … so storage size for graphing might be 30% or so higher.
No historical data is stored, which means that graphing data storage won’t grow with time.
Thank you very much!
Altho this kind of programming practice seems logical, most log files written by programs are infinite.