I like the policy of mikrotik to sell very customizable devices but a little of grphical interface would be fine
what do you think about ?
not as CAPsMan is now. I think likw TPlink omada controller or ubiquiti controller…
Maybe upcoming Winbox is like that.
More than “controller”, the posted example seems like a (good looking) “dashboard”.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dashboard_(computing)
Would be cool to have some dashboard in the upcoming Winbox. I really hope it is not just a blunt 1:1 clone of the old Winbox…
ok ,you re right … controller with graphic dashboard …
I understood it is not available now
I must say: NOOOOOO
That is a lot of useless “info”… you can see most of that in Winbox, even much more, and what you cannot see is not important at all:
Peak usage: what is that? How log did it last? 1 second? When? 3 weeks ago? … useless…
WiFi Experience? WTF?
BTW, ever heard of “Tools/Graphing”?
If I wanted that kind of nonsense for kids, I would go for Tp**** or Ubi****
There is even a worse thing behind this, not mentioned above: these “pretty” solutions use Cloud servers from TP and U.
I really really like that Mikrotik is not like others, tied to the servers somewhere far far away.
The more I use Mikrotik, more I find this “not-cloud based” philosophy important and an asset.
What fills some Mikrotik supporters with fear, is manna from heaven for others. Many people don’t want the undoubted complexity of RouterOS. Sometimes even the simplest install seems hard work and I’m know what I’m doing most of the time. The low down is that Mikrotik is not for the causal user - it requires a lot of learning but with that learning comes great power. But I do feel Mikrotik blocks itself out from certain market segments which is a shame.
normis asked some questions…
http://forum.mikrotik.com/t/question-to-our-users-about-controllers/178791/1