Hi,
Im running some nv2 ptp links on ros 5.26, and wounder if someone have any experience whit upgrading to ros 6.x in stability issues?
My CCQ is now about 90-95%, and would like to have 100% 
Or, should i let it be? if it ant broken, dont fix it 
Ragrds..
CCQ at 90-95% is very good.
What kind of stability problems do you have? Do the links disconnect, lose packets or do you mean unstable signal parameters?
On example for today is that the link went down to 60-70% CCQ, after ha disconnect of the client it went up to 95-99% again, no changes done.
I don’t understand. You say the CCQ went up after the client disconnected? So the CCQ is 95% when there is no client?
=)
I have a running ptp link whit, as we speak, 95/93CCQ, but about 1 hour ago, it was down on 60-70%. I kicked out the client so I it had to reconnect ant the link is up at about 95% again.
But I have another ptp link that is between 60-90% ccq. would an upgrade help to better/more stable ccq?
Upgrade to 6.19 (seems to be stable for nv2)
and try to play with frequency
I have 13km ptp link (5g/nv2/wds) CCQ is 100/95 and real throughput is about 100M halfduplex
I can also suggest setting the data rates and/or MCS static.
But id you read de changelog, they have lade some nv2/wireless changes. But is it fixes from ros5.x or are they new bugs that comes whit ros 6.x ?
Probably one thing you must keep in mind: They changed something with RSTP (and till now undocumented). So bridges sometimes hangs with enabled RSTp
Despite this Mikrotiks with nv2/ROS 6.19 and enabled wireless-fp works very well.
waiting for 6.22 where are fixes due to kernel crash. (in 6.19 stil persists, but not so annoying like eg 6.15)
Im not running bridges in my network, only routing via ospf and mpls/vpls.
What is wireless-fp? Is it another package then “wireless” ?
Well Then you must try it
fp wireless with fast path enabled.