Latency Problems and Disconnect Problems

Hello to all,
i have 2 ap, one with RouterOs3.0RC6 configured with AP-BRIDGE and the CPE Configured with station-pseudobridge.
Into the AP is enabled the Nstreame “none policy” (if i use dynamic size, the PPPOE cannot connect)because if disabled i have many packet loss with the CPE.
Into the CPE is enabled the Nstream “none policy” and i have the BRIDGE in WLAN1 and ETHER1.
I have configured 30 clients in a RB333 and i have many problems with LATENCY (10ms to 900ms and timeout) and the PPPOE client disconnect randomly when surf in the web, the pppoe link work for 2 hour and reconnect randomly.
The 2° AP is Configured with RouterOS3.0RC6 with AP-BRIDGE and the CPE Configured with Station.
I haven’t any Nstream but i have EOIP-TUNNEL for make the PPPOE SESSION.
In this configuration i haven’t any problems.
If configured with station-pseudobridge i can configure directly into the CPE the Public IP address and i can make a NAT and i haven’t problem of PPPOE session, but remain the problem of latency.
There is another configuration for work PPPOE session of PUBLIC IP ADDRESS Directly into the CPE?
The WDS is another way, but more than 30 clients connected there’s a problem with Latency and stability?
Awating your reply.
Best regards

Hello,
anyone say if Configured AP in WDS mode wich clients wds support? The AP is RouterBoard 333 with one radio.
Awaiting reply.
Best regards

I have a RB333 set up on my primary backhaul running 3.0rc7 . The primary feed coming in is 5.8 using XR5 and a SR5 and CM9 going out to two other locations as a backhaul. I have the 3 ethernet connections going to RB532 and another RB333 that are set up as AP’s. I am seeing all kinds of Latency problems at different times. When 4meg traffic is flowing all seems well but when it drops to 1.5 meg things get weird. If I didnt know better I would say that Im having data collisions off the ethernet ports. All the signals are in the -60 range and CCQ 90+%. Looks like I will have to pull the RB333 out.
Mike

i have same problem with rc9.. :frowning: