Load balancing problem.

Hi to all. I've read almost the all posts there were for load balancing, but i still have problem. I've used load balancing per connection and not for session, cause if i use donwload accelerator i will not take the full speed. Anyway it work without problem at least for 3-4 hours, and then the browsing is impossible. I can still ping google, but everything else breaks. I use MT 2.9.51, normaly licensed. Please guys help me cause i'm working on this for about 3 days now. after working for 3-4 hours or more, i have to disable one interface, disable all mangle rules and routes, to came back online. i'm sending my mikrotik config.:

[admin@MikroTik] > ip route print
Flags: X - disabled, A - active, D - dynamic, C - connect, S - static, r - rip, b - bgp, o - ospf,
B - blackhole, U - unreachable, P - prohibit

DST-ADDRESS PREF-SRC G GATEWAY DISTANCE INTERFACE

0 A S 0.0.0.0/0 r 80.78.70.193 1 Abcom
1 A S 0.0.0.0/0 r 192.168.2.1 1 Telekom
2 A S 0.0.0.0/0 r 80.78.70.193 1 Abcom
3 A S 0.0.0.0/0 r 80.78.70.193 1 Abcom
4 A S 0.0.0.0/0 r 80.78.70.193 1 Abcom
5 A S 0.0.0.0/0 r 80.78.70.193 1 Abcom
6 S 0.0.0.0/0 r 192.168.2.1 2 Telekom
7 ADC 80.78.70.192/27 80.78.70.218 0 Abcom
8 ADC 192.168.2.0/24 192.168.2.2 0 Telekom
9 ADC 192.168.10.0/24 192.168.10.1 0 Rrjeti


[admin@MikroTik] > ip firewall nat print
Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic
0 X chain=srcnat action=masquerade out-interface=Abcom routing-mark=odd

1 X chain=srcnat action=masquerade out-interface=Telekom routing-mark=even

2 chain=srcnat action=masquerade src-address=192.168.10.0/24

3 ;;; Web SERVER
chain=dstnat action=dst-nat to-addresses=192.168.10.2 to-ports=8000 dst-port=8000 protocol=tcp

4 ;;; Web SERVER 2
chain=dstnat action=dst-nat to-addresses=192.168.10.3 to-ports=8080 dst-port=8080 protocol=tcp

5 ;;; Web SERVER 2
chain=dstnat action=dst-nat to-addresses=192.168.10.37 to-ports=5500 dst-port=5500 protocol=tcp


[admin@MikroTik] > ip firewall mangle print
Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic
0 chain=prerouting action=mark-routing new-routing-mark=CS traffic passthrough=no dst-port=27015 protocol=udp

1 chain=prerouting action=mark-routing new-routing-mark=CS1 traffic passthrough=yes dst-port=27016 protocol=udp

2 chain=prerouting action=mark-routing new-routing-mark=CS2 traffic passthrough=yes dst-port=27017 protocol=udp

3 chain=prerouting action=mark-connection new-connection-mark=odd passthrough=yes connection-state=new
in-interface=Rrjeti nth=1,1,0

4 chain=prerouting action=mark-routing new-routing-mark=odd passthrough=no in-interface=Rrjeti connection-mark=odd

5 chain=prerouting action=mark-connection new-connection-mark=even passthrough=yes connection-state=new
in-interface=Rrjeti nth=1,1,1

6 chain=prerouting action=mark-routing new-routing-mark=even passthrough=no in-interface=Rrjeti connection-mark=even


[admin@MikroTik] > ip route rule print
Flags: X - disabled, I - inactive
0 src-address=0.0.0.0/0 dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 action=lookup table=main


this are my configs. Abcom and Telekom are Wan interface and Rrjeti is Lan interface.

And one more thing to ask. The first time i’ve configuret the mikrotik with 2 getways without any mangle, only the default from setup command, everything was normal, the test speed was load balanced, the donwload was load balanced, whatismyip.org and other sitet shows me the 2 real ips. But this situation i’ve testit only for 1 hour. Will load balancing work without any mangle, just in terminal setup ip address, setup g default gatways, add dns and that’s all?Best regards.

Any help please? I’m desperate.

What is bandwidth each of your channels?

Telekom has 800kbps-1000kbps, Abcom has 600kbps.

can u upgrade to 3.x ?? we have got no problems with load balancing even with 3 lines.

Thank you Caci for you response. But the configuration for load balancing for v3.x is the same for v2.9, ofcourse in v3.x nth is only 1.1 and not 1.1.0 like v2.9. In the future can you help me by email, we had drink a cofee together at Q.S. with Eri, and i bought e license from you.Best regards.

I’ve just discovered that i was using package routing-test and not routing. Can this be my problem of my troubles guys?