staff would like a good opinion of you is the following would mark the coming of my cache using mangle and queue trees, in March everything right today I confine my more queues 3MB tree in order not to bottleneck on my system so that only when all users start to download the queues tree bursts pulling himself from the cache on the internal network is lost performance was what I wanted to use the same process more than the queues for each tree rodasse ip individually when each client type catch something from my internal cache caisse in my rules and the queues tree would release to him a band of 512k and this was independent, had 20 people pulling the same file each one would be using their 512k’s internal queues tree on the network if it was nothing he would come from the cache use your simple queues.
i read twice but didnt understand the point 
let me be clear, I usually have a tree queues for certain rules to mangle whatever comes my cache for customers to use it, it is limited to 3mb right, which most would quash it respond individually to each ip coming from the cache using the queues tree aenas 512k, which responds to the entire class got kind 192.168.20.0/24 all who have this class and get something vao doc find queues share the tree of 3mb cache if not come oh yes it falls queues at simple, what I want and that instead of the class respodenr answer for every ip Individually if not need be creating numerous rules in the mangle for each ip.
you need to create a queue for WebProxy cache hits, so that it work for each user individually?.. use PCQ: http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Queues_-_PCQ
oh yes I’m already doing the tests used in the same way that you spoke to the HCW Hits that desire and so on for each track. thanks thanks.