Hi.
I need help finding the problem in my configuration.
I have tried different settings (40Mhz, 20Mhz, different channels, NV2, 802.11, Fixed data rates).
I can not exceed 80 / 40Mbps
Client has DinaDish AC
I have seen users with Wisp (TomjNorthIdaho) in the forum offering 100Mbps plans.
I have read that it only uses 1x1 NV2 …
Thank you
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1309M-xSnLg2EyyC1lNWG-6UCIwTftHDN/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gA9Rt_kjHAX0I-LxWutAa3gqgmdDeQJT/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qCpW2S2i-P8QpPpmhAC2I-Sht9-QZzOh/view?usp=sharing
Well actually I’m very impressed with your registration numbers. Having 173,5Mbps interface data rate is not seen that often. Signal needs to be strong and clear for this.
With 20 MHz bandwidth , dual spatial stream (2x2), this is the absolute maximum possible. See http://mcsindex.com/
I my experiments 802.11ac outperformed nv2. And the overhead of 802.11 is well known, the estimate of the net data rate is around 60%, it can vary 50% till 75%, of the interface rate.
This is due to the 802.11 overhead. Control packets sent at the basic rate (beacons, etc), and also the delays for media access, and overhead in the complex set of headers.
(Further lowered by access contention, interference, bit-errors, signal quality reduction …)
NV2 is not 802.11 n or ac. It’s time domain multiplexing. It has its own overhead, assigning air-time to all stations, plus even a free time-slot for a potential new registration.
It even has parameters to be tuned: nv2-downlink-ratio, nv2-cell-radius … . And there is quite a list of registrations in your list, each station gets some part of the air-time even when idle.
Using 20 MHz bandwidth and having 84/56Mbps test results on a test that is including the internet delays, is really my max expected.
It probably can be pushed up to 100Mbps on specific occasions, but this setting will have a lower upload speed.
If you test 802.11 , use ac-only, avoiding the “n” overhead. (Normally gives you some % extra)
If you want consistent 100 Mbps, then to me, you need 40 MHz bandwidth.
Hello
Thanks for reading and answering.
I have tested with 40Mhz, the speed only increases a few megabytes.
even, the upload speed decreases.
CCQ percentage is also affected
although the log table reaches really high values. I do not understand why I do not reach the limit of 100Mbps.
Thank you very much, I will upload an image with 40Mhz
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1biwOe1_I7HXS-plKyb4yCKiOvWEBh2XF/view?usp=sharing
“auto” as frequency selection is seldom a good choice. Find a clean 40 MHz slot yourselves in the 5 GHz band.
Having 172Mbps data rate on a 360 Mbps interface rate is perfectly normal, and is the double of your previous post. (85/60). Wifi is always half-duplex, by design, just as “speedtest” is half-duplex.
If you still get only 85 Mbps on speedtest, then your ISP is limiting, or some other part of the connection chain.
PS: you can add images to these posts as attachments, and tick-ing “place inline”
Auto is the CPE
I keep getting similar values in speed test …
Should I reduce the power of the AP?
What is the best option to reduce it?
The CPE have too much power?
Thanks for your time
OK, didn’t check for CPE .
Your connection is 172 Mbps data rate! Better than the 100 Mbps you ask for. When you get slower overall it is due to some other part of your “speedtest” link chain.
Can be LAN side that is limiting speedtest, can also be WAN side.
Set higher antenna gain than the real antenna gain, it will reduce the TXpower with the same amount
802.11 or nv2?
NV2