Hello,
I can not deal with Bonding between C3750 and MikroTik ver. 6.33.3 which I use as a hub for PPPoE clients. Has anyone done similar things at home and whether it is worth it or better to immediately invest in a 10Gbps card.
Below I am describing the config:
interface FastEthernet0 / 19
switchport trunk allowed vlan XX XX XX
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 3 mode active
channel-protocol lacp
!
interface FastEthernet0 / 20
switchport trunk allowed vlan XX XX XX
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 3 mode active
channel-protocol lacp
If someone was making link aggregation on similar hardware, I would be grateful for any tips
because in the current configuration, only one card is moving. In case when I have MT
ballanced on the CISCO chanel-group 3 mode on the movement spreads evenly only on the Tx side
EDIT: Now I just see what your real problem is.
That’s a (problem/bug/unsupported feature) on the Cisco side. As you can see, the routers spread well, the switch doesn’t
Load balancing only happens in the outbound (Tx) direction.
Your hash policy on the MikroTik is layer 2 and layer 3.
What is it on the Cisco?
I have a 2960 with gigabit uplinks ($45 shipped to my door!) set like this:
#show etherchannel load-balance
EtherChannel Load-Balancing Configuration:
src-dst-ip
EtherChannel Load-Balancing Addresses Used Per-Protocol:
Non-IP: Source XOR Destination MAC address
IPv4: Source XOR Destination IP address
IPv6: Source XOR Destination IP address
It doesn’t work so well with NAT coming from the WAN because the router is always the source IP or MAC so it tends to stay on one “side” of the etherchannel.
If yours supports src-dst-ip-port or something like that, you should probably try that. Mine doesn’t.
WItam, I need to do cisco etherchannel but I have tagged traffic. Tagged vlan-s from 100 - 400
switchport mode tunk
switchport trunk allow vlan 100-400
chanel group 3 mode on