ISP has given me a Private IP for PTP(/30) and a Public IP /32 and VLAN ID. I have created a VLAN on the WAN interface and given it the Private PTP IP on the Mikrotik router. The Gateway is the ISP’s Cisco Router
where should i put the /32 Public IP. on a cisco router this would have been a put on a loopback interface what of mikrotik
i am not able to ping the Gateway for the PTP /30 but it shows reachable on the routes list
what could be the issue
Cisco routers work well in the network and i know that mikrotik can do what cisco can, more the reason we want to start implementing Mikrotik on the Network
You could do much the same thing - i.e. put the /32 IP on a bridge interface and use SRC NAT on the traffic towards the ISP to use the /32 address as the source IP.
after activating the link my other link went down and the new route was preferred as opposed to the previous working route and shows gateway reachable.
will not show arp as the network is through and E1 link. is there a reason it would show reachable thru the VLAN Interface onto which the Private IP is configured while not able to ping.
my config for the Public IP was as below if any error confirm
chain:srcnat src address:(LAN IP Range) action:src-nat to-addresses:62.24.108.XXX out interface:VLAN
hope this is correct
that is what the ISP indicated and i had doubted that i had even interchanged but no result
config from a running cisco router looked like below
interface FastEthernet4.495
description UUNET Link WAN interface
encapsulation dot1Q 495
ip address 10.2.24.5 255.255.255.252
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly
!
interface Vlan1
LAN Interface
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip nbar protocol-discovery
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly
ip tcp adjust-mss 1430
!
ip forward-protocol nd
ip http server
no ip http secure-server
!
ip nat inside source list 103 interface loopback1090 overload
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.2.24.6
which would mean the .74 as gateway is correct
as here u see the ip on router is .5 and gateway(iso) .6
Hi
Can you post the routing part and the src-nat part for comparison purposes, looks like it is taking a toll on the CPU of the RB750
i would really appreciate