Hi Team
Any updates on mp-bgp on v7.1rc6 ? testing it out on lab and cant get the vpnv4 routes between the PE’s. set the peers as ibgp peers with next-hop set to force self
I have same problem on ROS7.1.1 Maybe now someone has achieved the work of VPNV4 or, as I understand it correctly, there is still no solution?
Some light now, mp-bgp vpnv4 working okay in version 7.3 from my labs as per below, so far soo good. mpls labels still missing , will definitely run further tests on this.
Great job @mikrotik team, appreciated
[admin@p8.mikey.rsco] > routing/route/print where routing-table=bank
Flags: A - ACTIVE; c, b, y - COPY; H - HW-OFFLOADED; +, B - BLACKHOLE
Columns: DST-ADDRESS, GATEWAY, AFI, DISTANCE, SCOPE, TARGET-SCOPE, IMMEDIATE-GW
DST-ADDRESS GATEWAY AFI DISTANCE SCOPE TARGET-SCOPE IMMEDIATE-GW
Ay 1.1.1.1/32 198.51.100.101 ip4 0 40 30 192.0.2.18%ether1
Ay 2.2.2.2/32 198.51.100.106 ip4 0 40 30 192.0.2.16%ether2
Ab 3.3.3.3/32 203.0.113.6@bank ip4 20 40 10 203.0.113.6%ether3
Ay + 8.8.8.8/32 198.51.100.109 ip4 0 40 30 192.0.2.18%ether1
192.0.2.16%ether2
Ay 100.64.0.0/31 198.51.100.101 ip4 0 40 30 192.0.2.18%ether1
Ay 100.64.0.2/31 198.51.100.106 ip4 0 40 30 192.0.2.16%ether2
Ay 100.64.0.4/31 198.51.100.101 ip4 0 40 30 192.0.2.18%ether1
Ay 100.64.0.6/31 198.51.100.106 ip4 0 40 30 192.0.2.16%ether2
Ay + 100.64.0.8/31 198.51.100.109 ip4 0 40 30 192.0.2.18%ether1
192.0.2.16%ether2
Ay 100.64.0.10/31 198.51.100.110 ip4 0 40 30 192.0.2.16%ether2
Ab 203.0.113.0/30 203.0.113.6@bank ip4 20 40 10 203.0.113.6%ether3
b 203.0.113.4/30 203.0.113.6@bank ip4 20 40 10 203.0.113.6%ether3
Ac 203.0.113.4/30 ether3@bank ip4 0 10 ether3
Ac fe80::%ether3/64 ether3@bank ip6 0 10 ether3
A H ether3 link 0
[admin@p8.mikey.rsco] >
[admin@p7.mikey.rsco] > routing/route/print where routing-table=nedbank
Flags: A - ACTIVE; c, b, y - COPY; H - HW-OFFLOADED
Columns: DST-ADDRESS, GATEWAY, AFI, DISTANCE, SCOPE, TARGET-SCOPE, IMMEDIATE-GW
DST-ADDRESS GATEWAY AFI DISTANCE SCOPE TARGET-SCOPE IMMEDIATE-GW
Ay 1.1.1.1/32 198.51.100.101 ip4 0 40 30 192.0.2.14%ether2
Ay 2.2.2.2/32 198.51.100.106 ip4 0 40 30 192.0.2.19%ether1
Ab 3.3.3.3/32 203.0.113.2@bank ip4 20 40 10 203.0.113.2%ether3
Ay 8.8.8.8/32 198.51.100.109 ip4 0 40 30 192.0.2.14%ether2
Ay 100.64.0.0/31 198.51.100.101 ip4 0 40 30 192.0.2.14%ether2
Ay 100.64.0.2/31 198.51.100.106 ip4 0 40 30 192.0.2.19%ether1
Ay 100.64.0.4/31 198.51.100.101 ip4 0 40 30 192.0.2.14%ether2
Ay 100.64.0.6/31 198.51.100.106 ip4 0 40 30 192.0.2.19%ether1
Ay 100.64.0.8/31 198.51.100.109 ip4 0 40 30 192.0.2.14%ether2
Ay 100.64.0.10/31 198.51.100.110 ip4 0 40 30 192.0.2.19%ether1
b 203.0.113.0/30 203.0.113.2@bank ip4 20 40 10 203.0.113.2%ether3
Ac 203.0.113.0/30 ether3@bank ip4 0 10 ether3
Ab 203.0.113.4/30 203.0.113.2@bank ip4 20 40 10 203.0.113.2%ether3
Ac fe80::%ether3/64 ether3@bank ip6 0 10 ether3
A H ether3 link 0
[admin@admin@p7.mikey.rsco] >
[admin@bank] > tool/traceroute 1.1.1.1 src-address=3.3.3.3
Columns: ADDRESS, LOSS, SENT, LAST, AVG, BEST, WORST, STD-DEV, STATUS
ADDRESS LOSS SENT LAST AVG BEST WORST STD-DEV STATUS
1 100% 46 timeout
2 192.0.2.14 0% 45 5.2ms 4.8 2.8 9.2 1.5 <MPLS:L=21,E=0 L=35,E=0,T=1>
3 192.0.2.8 0% 45 3.4ms 4.8 2.5 13.2 2.3 <MPLS:L=22,E=0 L=35,E=0,T=1>
4 100.64.0.0 0% 45 2.4ms 3.9 1.6 28.7 3.9 MPLS:L=35,E=0
5 1.1.1.1 0% 45 2.8ms 4.2 2.1 10.6 1.8
[admin@bank] >
Hello.
I’m using ROS 7.5
I have assembled a circuit between two CCR2004-16G-2S +, if you specify vrf in the bgp connection, the bgp session does not rise.
Someone faced similar?
Does MP-BGP work at all in Router OS 7?
it my test it does, but it flaps continuously, as per other forum member vpn4 still broken in v7
this is my topology, P1 also is a route reflector, MPLS is working but the advertise prefix from CE1 192.168.20.0/24 (route flag daY) via OSPF is keep on flapping on PE2
