I’m trying to determine a comparable rating system for my Mikrotik (or really any MT that I build).
We have a MT on a Celeron 600MHz that has 4 ethernet ports and 2 cyclades t1 ports. It works great.
We are starting to pass LOTS of VOIP through the network (from Cisco 5300’s located behind the MT). The Ciscos handle all the g729 conversion and simply pass the traffic as IP through the MT.
With other routers, I found that at a certain level of traffic, the router would max the CPU because of the high number of IP packets per second (the VOIP traffic passes lots of packets per second, ~ 8K for each conversation)
So my single deciding factor in future deployments is how robust the router is with Packets Per Second handling.
The Cisco ones I’ve looked at handle 225k pps and a Lucent 1500 is handling 300k pps.
So, is there a benchmark for the MT? I mean, for example, on a P4 3.0GHz with 256MB of ram, will the MT handle 100k, 200k, 400k, 600k pps??
Does anyone know?
I know it can handle bunches of data throughput (5MB, 10MB+ etc) but that’s not the problem here, it’s the number of packets per second it can support…
I dont have the data on a P4 3ghz, but i do know that 600kpps on a P3 600 mhz using FreeBSD v4.8, Intel PRO 100S adapters.
So alot more than 600kpps it most certainly is. RouterOS seems to be quite optimized when it comes to routing operations.
run bandwidth-test on A router , receive from C router.I want test B router (Kpps).
I monitor A router NIC, it’s received-packets-per-second 51543.
at this tim received-packets-per-second = max forward packet per second, is true?