I need advice and guidance on how to resolve the following situation:
Ether1 (ChotNet): Primary internet with static public IP address
Ether2 (LTE): Secondary internet, connected device LHGGM, which is set in passthrough mode, dynamic IP
WireGuard - VPN client on njalla
Ether3-24: bridge
I would like to ensure that for computers connected to the Mikrotik in the local network:
Part of the communication would go through Ether2 interface (communication to IP 31.15.10.33)
Part of the communication would go through WireGuard but only via Ether1 (communication to IP 77.78.109.86)
And the rest would only go through Ether1
I’ve been looking through https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ROS/Load+Balancing but I’m not sure which method is most suitable for my situation?
A. which users/devices through ether1 WAN
B. which users/devices through ether1 Wireguard
C. which users/.devices through ether2
Per Line, are they describable by SUBNET [ (V)LAN ], a couple of users, many users but not a full subnet, mix of users from multiple subnets, single user ???
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
For the connections themselves.
(1) What happens if Ether1 becomes unavailable… what are your expectations??
(2) What happens if Ether2 becomes unavailable… what are your expectations??
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
What else havent you told us… for example are there any public facing servers on the Router???
For the users:
A, B, C: All devices in the network are treated uniformly. The interface used for communication will be determined solely by the destination IP address.
For the connections themselves:
1, 2: In both cases, communication to the target IP addresses will not be available if the respective interface goes down. There’s no need for failover between internet connections.
Additional Information:
Yes, there is one server behind the router that is accessible via ether1.