With CCR1036 you can achieve without problem 10Gbps of CG-NAT for internet subscribers when properly configured and deployed in a Network, i expect CCR2116 deliver the same or better performance, for around 1.000 USD and aprox 60 watt of power consumption this boxes offer a good CG-NAT solution
I’m doing CGNAT with a 1036 for the time being, handling 2Gbps for ~400 households. I have 2116’s on the border handling BGP and some internal NAT.
The 1036 hums away at 3-6% utilization. The 2116’s have a higher CPU load, but I’m not running L3 hardware offload on them (yet)… it’s a little too wonky at the moment, at least for my config.
My home/office router is also a 2116, and I have experimented with HW offload on it; 7.5 “fixed” a few things, so naturally it’s broken and I had to disable it.