i use intel 7260ac connet NetMetal 5 work on ac only or a/n/ac，only work on 54mbps too。but if i use surface pro3 can work on 585mbps。i think maybe compatible problem。
if set NetMetal 5 work on a/n，use intel 7260ac connet NetMetal 5 can work on 270mbps。 [Laughing] i don’t know why。and i try hold on open bandwidth-test on intel 7260ac。this time if i remove intel 7260ac at NetMetal 5 use capsman，intel 7260ac will reconnet very soon and work on real 802.11ac rate。if disconnet and without open bandwidth-test to connet NetMetal 5，will work 54mbps at the same。
you can try use a/n mode，good luck！
Strange Wehave fixed that issue with Intel AC cards Could you send supout to us?
What setting do you have for NV2, TDMA Period ? Try set to 1ms, I have much better performanse on 1ms vs “auto” or higher values.
My question for experts, and Mikrotik staff, are that I experience better performance on 802.11 vs NV2.
Link are 11km, with mANT30 + NetMetal5.
Nv2 - 100 Mbps less transfer ?
80211.png
Try to uncheck Advertise 1000 Mbps Half and Full settings on the ethernet interfaces of the netmetals so that it negotiates at 100 Mbps.
If that works way better, try to play with Tx/Rx Flow control on 1000 Mbps too.
Let us know the results.
Speed test has been made between 2 Wifi interfaces, LAN speed are in this scenario inessential.
Hello,
What is the final output, of this matter, was that solved or not.
I have 18 Km link and with NetMetal 5 +mANT30 . I able to get 200 MB Link . Only problem it is fluctuating from 180 to 220MB .
TatalinkNetMetal5.jpg
Vishvas , can you share your wireless configuration ?
Thank you
Same request.
I have SXT ac link 300m and its not able to get more than 100Mb also ccq is moving like crazy, I had open topic about it and MT couldnt bring any solution so I gave up and keep using ubnt as its working much better than MT.
Wish to test some other configs maybe at last smth ll help.
what is maximum one way throughoutput (tcp) you get from netmetal in N or AC (only 20mhz channel size)?
I can’t get more than 70mb with a 50mb average. I would really like some help with this topic.
11km link… Testing from wireless AP interface directly to the wireless station interface.
-55 to -60 signal strength.
Nv2 1ms
802.11AC Only
Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
In this post i share my excellent results with the Netmetal 5, the link distance is 46Km
http://forum.mikrotik.com/t/netmetal-ac-field-deployment-230mbps-fd/91180/1
I share my wireless configuration, maybe it could help
AP Side
/interface wireless
set [ find default-name=wlan1 ] adaptive-noise-immunity=ap-and-client-mode band=5ghz-a/n/ac basic-rates-a/g=“” channel-width=20/40/80mhz-Ceee disabled=no frequency=5905 frequency-mode=superchannel
ht-basic-mcs=“” ht-supported-mcs=mcs-8,mcs-9,mcs-10,mcs-11,mcs-12,mcs-13 mode=bridge radio-name=“p2p Chaves to Juarez (AP)” rate-set=configured rx-chains=0,1 scan-list=ETERNET ssid=chaves2juarez
supported-rates-a/g=“” tdma-period-size=4 tx-chains=0,1 vht-supported-mcs=mcs0-7,mcs0-7,mcs0-7 wireless-protocol=nv2
Client Side
/interface wireless
set [ find default-name=wlan1 ] band=5ghz-a/n/ac basic-rates-a/g=“” channel-width=20/40/80mhz-Ceee disabled=no
frequency=auto frequency-mode=superchannel ht-basic-mcs=“” ht-supported-mcs=“” radio-name=Chaves2Juarez58
rate-set=configured rx-chains=0,1 scan-list=5880-5960 ssid=chaves2juarez supported-rates-a/g=“” tdma-period-size=
4 tx-chains=0,1 vht-basic-mcs=none vht-supported-mcs=mcs0-8,mcs0-8,none wireless-protocol=nv2-nstreme-802.11
Could it be that the radio is overloaded, is producing noise or the standing wave level is high (http://www.radiomagonline.com/misc/0082/standing-waves-and-antennas/26360)?
I would try reducing power. 66dB SNR is overkill.
I dunno what to say… I’ve tried matching the settings that Ginsu has above… Tried channel after channel (mind you, there is hardly any interference)… Still nothing above 100mb with a 40-50mb average.
Tell me, what are the symptoms of a bad rp-sma cable? Or what happens if my fresnel zone is obstructed?
17km shot… All water in between. Antennas about 30 feet off the water level. -55 signal strength.
I’m testing a with a one way (transmit) bandwidth test from the wireless AP to the station. 20 tcp connections.
Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
Kristaps what type of intel AC cards have improve the bandwidth issue of mikrotik’s netmetal 5?
I just have tested Rocket AC ptp-lite vs. netmetal5 - same antennas, same position on tower..same testing procedure..
Rocket AC ptp-lite is 15-20% faster than Netmetal 5.
In favor of Rocket AC and all ubiquity new AC gear is second wireless chip which scans enviroment all the time, without interrupting link. If this doesnt make Mikrotik in his products in few months, years is MIkrotik lost in wireless segment…
40mhz Channel, mikrotiks parabolics 45 degree slant, and a net metal over 13km, 99-100%ccq both ways and this
mtik.PNG
Couldn’t be happier. Nothing fancy about the configuration just fallowing good guidelines for any ptp install.