Hello All.
I am having a serious problem! I have configured in my Mikrotik two gateway different. Configured with the following exits: from_net1, from_net2, rest and main.
[matias@Xxxxxx] ip address> print
Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic
ADDRESS NETWORK BROADCAST INTERFACE
0 16.10.100.1/24 16.10.100.0 16.10.100.255 senao
1 10.16.0.1/24 10.16.0.0 10.16.0.255 senao
2 172.16.0.1/24 172.16.0.0 172.16.0.255 senao
3 ;;; BRASIL TELECOM
200.101.90.206/28 200.101.90.192 200.101.90.207 Publica
4 172.20.0.1/24 172.20.0.0 172.20.0.255 senao
5 200.101.15.42/29 200.101.15.40 200.101.15.47 IPTURBO
6 192.168.0.1/24 192.168.0.0 192.168.0.255 senao
7 192.168.5.1/24 192.168.5.0 192.168.5.255 senao
8 ;;; Teste Tiago NAT
192.168.10.1/24 192.168.10.0 192.168.10.255 senao
9 D 172.20.0.1/32 172.20.0.241 0.0.0.0
10 D 10.16.0.1/32 10.16.0.3 0.0.0.0
[matias@Faarnet] ip policy-routing> print
Flags: D - dynamic
NAME
0 from_net1
1 from_net2
2 rest
3 D main
[matias@Faarnet] ip policy-routing table from_net1> print
Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic, R - rejected
TYPE DST-ADDRESS G GATEWAY DISTANCE INTERFACE
0 static 0.0.0.0/0 r 200.101.90.193 1 Publica
[matias@Faarnet] ip policy-routing table from_net2> print
Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic, R - rejected
TYPE DST-ADDRESS G GATEWAY DISTANCE INTERFACE
0 static 0.0.0.0/0 r 200.101.15.41 1 IPTURBO
[matias@Faarnet] ip policy-routing table rest> print
Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic, R - rejected
TYPE DST-ADDRESS G GATEWAY DISTANCE INTERFACE
0 static 0.0.0.0/0 r 200.101.90.193 1 Publica
[matias@Faarnet] ip policy-routing table main> print
Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic, R - rejected
TYPE DST-ADDRESS G GATEWAY DISTANCE INTERFACE
0 X ;;; added by setup
1 D connect 200.101.90.192/28 r 0.0.0.0 0 Publica
2 D connect 200.101.15.40/29 r 0.0.0.0 0 IPTURBO
3 D connect 192.168.10.0/24 r 0.0.0.0 0 senao
4 D connect 192.168.5.0/24 r 0.0.0.0 0 senao
5 D connect 192.168.0.0/24 r 0.0.0.0 0 senao
6 D connect 172.20.0.0/24 r 0.0.0.0 0 senao
7 D connect 172.20.0.241/32 r 0.0.0.0 0
8 D connect 172.16.0.0/24 r 0.0.0.0 0 senao
9 D connect 16.10.100.0/24 r 0.0.0.0 0 senao
10 D connect 10.16.0.0/24 r 0.0.0.0 0 senao
11 D connect 10.16.0.3/32 r 0.0.0.0 0
[matias@Faarnet] ip policy-routing rule> print
Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid
SRC-ADDRESS DST-ADDRESS INTERFACE FLOW ACTION TABLE
0 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 all lookup main
1 16.10.100.0/24 0.0.0.0/0 all lookup from_net1
2 10.16.0.0/24 0.0.0.0/0 all lookup from_net1
3 172.16.0.0/24 0.0.0.0/0 all lookup from_net2
4 172.20.0.0/24 0.0.0.0/0 all lookup from_net2
5 192.168.0.0/24 0.0.0.0/0 all lookup from_net2
6 192.168.5.0/24 0.0.0.0/0 all lookup from_net1
7 192.168.10.0/24 0.0.0.0/0 all lookup from_net2
8 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 all lookup rest
What it happens is the following one: The customers who are connected in from_net2 do not obtain to see the net of from_net1. I need that the customers who are connected in from_net2 enchergue the net from_net1 because, the net from_net1 this housing a Web page and a Server of WebMail. E the customers of the net from_net2 does not obtain to have access its email. In my opinion I find that it has that to have a rule in firewall, but I do not know which that I have q to make, ja I tried of you vary ways but so far n I had success. Debtor.