I say I’m using the google translator and then forgive if the English is not very clear.
My dear Mikrotik, I hope you read me and I hope you do not misunderstand my thoughts and just to understand that we have all our microtalk network, I do not ask you for an exact date or you know about Date expiration, but I think it’s right Communicate to all Google users if at least you’re really working on syncing with gps and new wireless protocols. At this time, despite all the commitment that each of us can put in, we have more or less some problems dictated by various factors, such as the demand to offer ever more bandwidth and consequently to carry it, and the ability to reduce the noise given From the interference due to the factor that is increasingly needed because an industry with more than 20 clients begins to degrade quality.
If you do not plan to invest resources to resolve these issues, it is the case that it is clearly communicated to all of us that we still have a hope for this to happen.
Normis made alive
Even if I agree on your points, I have to ask: who is “we” and “all Google users” ?
I am a Google user an no one asked for my opinion. And I don’t remember electing a representative to speak for me, as a Google user, in this forum. Probably the same goes for the other some 1 billion Google users.
So please stop talking in the name of a group which you do not represent and speak for yourself only, whoever you are, e.g. “I, mikrowifi” and don’t try to gain more weight on your question using the “all Google users” crap.
Now coming to the GPS sync issue: one can have tons of GPS synced APs and clients, if the radio bands are trashed, it still won’t work as expected. There’s a cold war going on here, with all new protocols and modulations, and everybody looses. Because interference will only grow, since each incompatible protocol will make that used channel appear free to a device not supporting that specific scheme, so guess what? They will overlap and interfere with each other. It already happens with 802.11 vs. NV, NV2, Airmax and other OEM protocols.
The key is not GPS, it is mutual visibility and interference avoidance, which is something OEMs have to agree upon. Sometimes all are better off using standard 802.11 b/g/n than other mix of proprietary stuff jamming each other, GPS synced or not.
Absolutely correct, the key is for all manufacturers to agree on a protocol and work together on it, however that approach doesn’t force you into buying only the 1 manufacturers equipment so it won’t ever happen.
Let me say that they are views of these, in fact as the cambium hardware is well known in the same conditions and in the same interferences by gps sync makes more and is a proven one. So think the gps from a greater bandwidth. Regarding my google quote I’m sorry if there was a misunderstanding, since I just said I used the google translator and that therefore possible errors in this english are attributed to a non-perfect translation. I’ve been clear? thank you
Inviato dal mio iPhone utilizzando Tapatalk
Ok, now it’s clear.
The issue I am pointing out is the fact that TDMA implementations solve the hidden client problem and give a better throughput, under the condition to have a clean channel.
If 2 different wireless protocols are co-located on a channel, they will just interfere and there’s nothing one can do (while classic WiFi streams can coexist).
And IMHO, there is no real need of a GPS if the protocol knows how to handle TDMA allocations and synchornization without it, the outcome would be just the same: a proper full functioning TDMA channel. Because of the insistent use of the magic word “GPS” all over in modern items, I assume this is more as a marketing strategy than a real benefit or need, since there are other synchronization algorithms on par with it, which don’t need a PPS source.
Mikrotik has no future in professional wireless 
Such statement is just a question of opinion and attitude. Both are relative…
Ok. But at this point either with gps or without gps I think it’s correct to tell if there will be a new version of nv2 with some improvement of tdma or anything else. At this time other competitors have a boost in both gps and gps. Obviously this is not the case, but as far as the problem of reducing transport on more than one ptp in nv2 and the amount of data an industry can produce there is not much history, moreover a AC stopping to go.
Inviato dal mio iPhone utilizzando Tapatalk