Noise-floor information

Can someone (possibly from MT) please explain how the noise-floor information is calculated? I can run a snoop or freq-usage and find the absolute worst channel to operate on, setup my wlan on it and MT shows a -98 noise-floor and then change to a clear channel (low bandwidth usage) and it shows a -92.

Is anyone else having any luck using these values to determine clear channels? It would be nice to see some documentation on determining the best channel to operate on. There are so many tools now with the Scan, Freq. Usage, snooper, etc but no documentation to back them up.

I also was wondering this.

I have noise floor of -107 is that good or bad?

Is -90 better than -107 ? or teh other way around?

Thanks

From what i know the lower the better, -107 is ALOT better than -90

The noise floor is only for non 802.11 activity on the spectrum. 802.11 traffic is not considered noise in this case.

John

me also i have -98 to -99 is that good or bad?
im using AMP 1 watt is that have effect on noise?

John, is Nstreme considered to be 802.11 for purposes of calculating the noise floor?

Thanks
George

Yes, Nstreme uses the same frame encoding (ofdm…) as 802.11.

John

Thank you Sir. We are finding this new feature very useful.

George

how exactly are you finding this new feature very useful?

Because it gives you a clear picture of non-802.11 noise. This could be from propietery wifi stuff, cordless phones, noisy transformers, etc. Not sure if it detects out-of-band harmonics.

Eric

Exactly. Now if we could only have a “spectrum analyzer” type display for noise floor across all the channels life would be truly wonderful.

Check out an Orthogon Gemini for an example of doing it right. Signal strengths and noise floor on a single display across all channels.

George

Here is a spectrum analyzer from the Alvarion 900mhz equipment. The display is cumulative, and in this case, it’s been scanning for 6 minutes. It shows average and peak signal levels.