Nstreme Dual VS Airmax TDMA Ubiquiti

Hello Guys,

Wanted to learn a subject that turns me on the head by several months,
or to compare two different technologies to evaluate the merits and
defects of both.
The two technologies in question are dual Nstreme of Mikrotik and Airmax
Ubiquiti of TDMA.

What I refer you to our friends in the forum is nothing but a
real comparison, wanting to make a brief analysis of the two protocols
point of view of the radio link protocol Nstreme Dual
providing two physically separate antennas that deal with two
different aspects of a TX RX and the other gives us a radio link
30Mbps full duplex bi-directional then TX ↔ 30Mbps while the RX
TDMA protocol will have access to a single antenna can transmit or
receives or is lost then the speech to have a full duplex link.

Now I ask you to make a second link point to point something
better to use?

MikroTik also has TDMA, it’s called Nv2.


So MikroTik has both TDMA and it’s own Nstreme technology.

So you have not answered my question, I also know that Mikrotik has NV2.

NV2 is a test package that is full of issues. I don’t think there is a comparison between NV2 and Ubiquity TDMA at this point in time.

Trust me I have tried to use NV2 as have many others who have listed problems on the forums and who have been sending your Spouts and support requests.

I don’t know of any real issues. Yes, a few people on the forum have had trouble configuring it, but that’s it. You know how it is - when something works, you don’t come shouting to the forums.

i had 1 loockup on x86 system with 4.16 and nv2, but i cant create supout file from there.

OK, x86 has one known issue. But use RouterBOARD instead :slight_smile:

How about you guys let out the secret sauce NV2 config for XR2 PTMP for the masses then :smiley:

MikroTik nstreme-dual could give better ping times. So it could be better than Airmax and NV2.

NV2 gives me big good stable thruput with ping times I can work with.

With the latest product by MikroTik, NV2 beats all overall.

Normis, I have a small old pentium III 1000 mhz boards, they are like routerboards…

Are you running NV2 in P2P applications?

???

Seconding this, Full setup details outside of a 5m lab link. It’s turning out like 11n, There were loads of gotchas and little documentation from MT about it, It’s only recently that we were informed that 11n cards must use chain0 for single chain operation and that using chain1 with nothing attached to chain0 would damage the card/not work

My colleague is still using chain1 for an AP for PtMP in 802.11a :slight_smile: Clients are not complaining.

This is a “MikroTik forum”. Not “Mikrotik vs other stuff” forum.