What protocol do you recommend that you have not lost packages? I suppose there will be an alternative to nv2 as it is an old protocol.
Read above
From what I see nv2 is an old protocol, I must use a new protocol: 802.11ac that loses packets. sorry for the waste of time for the question. I thought mikrotik was solving the nv2 with ac but I see that “it is solved already” Greetings.
There is No Future for WISP with Mikrotik Wireless!
So you are saying that you need new protocol, because nv2 doesn’t work, because you have interference.
And you blame 802.11ac ?
I have achieved great results with nv2, nstreme and 802.11…
You just have to know what protocol to use and when..
With 802.11ac, Polluted Spektrum, in PTMP it is impossible to deliver jitter free Internet and VoIP Service
There is TDMA needed and NV2 archives more than poor speeds with 802.11ac Hardware
Zacharias please share the result
We don’t need NV3 we need modern hardware that allows modern TDMA software like other vendors 
Will that help you in the configuration of your point to point link?
I need help in ptmp I only have 60-70 mb in free 20mhz without loss packet
You said (i think) that you are deployed an ptp link, so WHY you are using mantbox 19 ? Is a sector antenna that covers 120 deg.
please give us more info about your peering devices, distance and a schematic would be usefull!
I use mantbox19s in multipoint
please attach your wireless config here and answer all of my questions above in order to help you
@Normis
When a clients ask about nv2 or nv3 is because normally we use it for outdoor deployment.
In which universe can you get 500 Mbps for outdoor wireless? Specially when getting 40 client in an AP?
When you say use modern protocol, are you saying NV2 is logacy and not suitable for todays network.
I am a small wisp with 200 mikrotik CPE and I can tell you that it is very difficult to reach 70Mbps in an AP with 35 clients on mikrotik. However, i have also UBNT, Cambium and Mimosa and they are able to deliver more bandwidrh and more stable latency than mikrotik.
If you have any recomendation as to how you can get better results with mikrotik devices, please provide it.
I can also tell you that the clients (we wisp) are getting out of patience with mikrotik and that this kind of answer are not right.
If you dont want to improve the tdma wireless protocol and not provide any answer to the clients, please go ahead, but later dont ask why you lost that market.
People will look for an alternative solution and if that solution work, they will not come back.
this is the harsh reality … any manufacturer today offers better results and the worst is the way to deal with the situation that Mikrotik has … a few months ago I changed quite a lot for this problem and if from here at the end of the year the ac does not improve … I will have to change the rest … It is very sad that they deny reality from mikrotik. the wisp would appreciate a sincere response
Mikrotik´s Business decision is clear, take a look to the available Products for WISP, there are only low Cost devices available.
All Devices has poor shielding, not useable for busy arears (when i do scan at worst place on Omnitik i see about 25 Networks)
Devices with Metal shielding did not get update to Wave 2 (And Mikrotik Wireless Driver is only Suitable for Wave 2 to step by step, a long way…)
For RB´s there is no PCIe with Wave 2 (so we cannot build something by our own, Modules from another Manufactores/ Chipsets are not supported)
They decide to lost this market, but they do not communicate that, because the sales would go to bottom line, if the do so.
They want to sell in low cost market, low fares for regions where customers are not able to pay much
This is true mikrotik?
Silence is your answer…
Sorry but i do not agree with you…
I got many ptp and ptmp links in busy areas inside the city that perform as expected…