PCC + WebProxy + Hostpot + QoS not work...

RouterOS General
1

Mikrotik friends,

I have recreated exactly this example (http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:PCC) in a clean install of 5.0RC3 MT RouterOS.

“FCC works very well on wlan1 - 4mb and wlan2 - 4mb (50% and 50%)”

The problem:

  • Web proxy service not work
  • hostpot service not work
  • QoS/tree service not work

I tried other configurations without success :frowning:

Thanks for your help

My actual config:

Ip Firewall Mangle> ;;

PCC Load Balancing
0 chain=input action=mark-connection new-connection-mark=wlan1_conn passthrough=yes in-interface=wlan1
1 chain=input action=mark-connection new-connection-mark=wlan2_conn passthrough=yes in-interface=wlan2
2 chain=output action=mark-routing new-routing-mark=to_wlan1 passthrough=yes connection-mark=wlan1_conn
3 chain=output action=mark-routing new-routing-mark=to_wlan2 passthrough=yes connection-mark=wlan2_conn
4 chain=prerouting action=accept dst-address=10.111.0.0/24 in-interface=Local
5 chain=prerouting action=accept dst-address=10.112.0.0/24 in-interface=Local
6 chain=prerouting action=mark-connection new-connection-mark=wlan1_conn passthrough=yes dst-address-type=!local in-interface=Local per-connection-classifier=both-addresses:2/0
7 chain=prerouting action=mark-connection new-connection-mark=wlan2_conn passthrough=yes dst-address-type=!local in-interface=Local per-connection-classifier=both-addresses:2/1
8 chain=prerouting action=mark-routing new-routing-mark=to_wlan1 passthrough=yes in-interface=Local connection-mark=wlan1_conn
9 chain=prerouting action=mark-routing new-routing-mark=to_wlan2 passthrough=yes in-interface=Local connection-mark=wlan2_conn

;;; Traffic Prioritization
10 chain=prerouting action=mark-packet new-packet-mark=voip-sip-total passthrough=no dscp=26
11 chain=prerouting action=mark-packet new-packet-mark=voip-rtp-total passthrough=no dscp=46
12 chain=prerouting action=mark-packet new-packet-mark=icmp-total passthrough=no protocol=icmp
13 chain=prerouting action=mark-packet new-packet-mark=http-total passthrough=no protocol=tcp dst-port=80
14 chain=prerouting action=mark-packet new-packet-mark=https-total passthrough=no protocol=tcp dst-port=443
15 chain=prerouting action=mark-packet new-packet-mark=pop3-rx passthrough=no protocol=tcp src-port=110
16 chain=prerouting action=mark-packet new-packet-mark=imap-rx passthrough=no protocol=tcp src-port=143
17 chain=prerouting action=mark-packet new-packet-mark=imap-rx passthrough=no protocol=udp src-port=143
18 chain=prerouting action=mark-packet new-packet-mark=p2p2-total passthrough=no p2p=all-p2p

2

Why always go for overkill? I think this is most complicated set of features that you can have to implement QoS

If you can, i suggest to separate this functionality into 2 boxes:
a) PCC +QoS
b) Hotspot+Webproxy

Anyway your problem description is insufficient to suggest anything else.

3

I agree with McGaiver.

Overkill with hardware and bandwidth to Not do configuration overkill.

Big configs like this have to be 1. built (time and money) 2. supported (time and money) by someone like me. And what if I don’t have time ? :slight_smile:


BY THE WAY please give me access to this router. I want to verify a couple of things. (RC bugs)

Now that I think of it, I could work on the config as a sports event for 20 minutes, to take try to bring it to a working condition. And report back in this thread what the progress is so McGaiver could contribute for example. :slight_smile: