I do not know where is the problem
Image at the bottom
ap bridge
mod b

I do not know where is the problem
Image at the bottom
ap bridge
mod b

add route to next machine so that signal data is exchanged properly.
Interference? what is the noise floor?
he has already said, -71 + 33dB = noise floor of -104dB
I will try to change the channel What is the correct way to select the channel
Evening, the situation is very stable
I did not understand
Channel selected by the radar
Today just confirmed that the problem of channel
But how do you get the channel free from noise
Please explain the method of selecting a photographer for the channel free from noise and the correct settings
Please customers want an urgent solution
Reference to the problem of preference and bandwidth is not good
Channel selection depends on the band you’re working, in the 2 GHz band, each channel has a separation of 5 MHz each and 20mhz radio uses the 802.11b / g, so the only channels that are not overlap are 1,6,11, if you fit in the middle of any insurance they’re going to affect two channels at the top and bottom.
if you use the 5GHz band have more channels to choose is no overlap between them.
if you want the software chooses the best channel DFS activate it the option and wait for him to do a spectrum analysis and then is positioned in the channel but uncrowded.
Greetings
Today changed the card Alpha 1 W
And still the problem

Excellent Signal and Bandwidth bad
Citing an excellent person, but browsing has very bad
These are picture of the Settings
alfa 1w + rb433ah + omni 15 db





Please help
1: Check route from the station to the AP
2: Scan from AP and study how active other channels are.
3: change channel in AP to other end of Band and look to see if situation improves.
4: change station end to 10Mhz wide channel, and set mode to G.
5: change Ap end to 10Mhz wide channel and set mode to G.
6: From your scan that you did in No2. Pick a channel that had little activity.
7. Set station end to mode any.
8. set Ap end to NV2
9: Enable NV2 security in both, see wiki.
10: If none of that works, swop to 5.8g
11: chuck Alpha card in bin!
12: Use the Ubiquity XR2, XR5 or SR71.
Now mode g Only
Situation has improved little
data retas
Photo attached
If you choose to
1 mb 2 mb 5.5 mb
Gets worse near the transmitter and an excellent reference, but data transmission is bad
What is the best preparation data retas for 2.4 mode g channel 1

For data-rates i would recommend using 1Mb for 802.11b, and 6,18,24 for 802.11g.
For channel selection, you can use some tools inside mikrotik like frequency-usage, snopper, scan.
It looks like you cpe does not have clear line of sight to the AP.
To much power does not give you any benefit at all. Working with sector antennas instead of omni and aligning the cpe with line of sight and clean fresnel zone will help you solving this issues.
Best regards,
do not create too much noise by putting a high powered card. use alfa n66 card it shld be gud enuff. if region has too much interference use “b” only mode instead of “g” only.
use high powered cpe instead so that it may grab the weekest signals. i have deployed these rules with success. i donnu but i hv found many ppl use high power AP
But the rule is:
I hope the above info is helpfull ![]()
My question is easy
Why when I activate the 1 mb 2 mb 5.5 mb In data retas
Become bad
Why does not my channel width

What is the problem
It´s normal, please read about what is OFDM, DSSS, CCK and how it works.
In a more simply way, OFDM works with sub-carriers instead of only one big carrier, so your system will have higher chance to receive some of them. This means that you will have higher ccq on 802.11g.
Best regards,
buddy how much bandwidth r u distributing to ur clients
if u enable data rates u r putting a cap to that. since links r usually half duplex CPE’s u will get throughput of only half the data rates.
divide the thruput with the number of clients u have. that is the actual thruput u r leaving for 1 client.
Enabling data rates is not advisable for Point to multi point links.
I guess ur latency must be going very high whn enabling data rates