PPP & VRF bug?

Hi all,

I have created PPP client interface with “Add default route” enabled and then created a VRF with PPP client interface attached to it. As a result I’ve got connected route created with a expected routing mark and default route with main routing mark assigned which was unexpected to me. Is this correct behavior or a bug?


PPP is not fully VRF aware. Workaround is to change table with route filters or use scripts to add routes manually to correct VRF.

Hi mrz, thanks for the workaround. Added the following rule and now it works as I need it. Also learned a new thing about RouterOS. Previously I thought routing filters are only for OSPF/BGP.


/routing filter add chain=dynamic-in distance=2 prefix=0.0.0.0 prefix-length=0 set-routing-mark=backup

I hope adding VRF support to PPP is still on the roadmap for v7 !