I have a Speedstream 4200 DSL modem which can support Halfbridge mode - I’m wanting this to passthrough my public IP to the Mikrotik router so I don’t have to have double NATing happening. I’m also in New Zealand and theres only PPPoA available here so PPPoE is not an option.
My IP address is 58.28.152.xx but my gateway is 58.28.15.xx and the subnet mask is /24.
Obviously MT doesn’t like this and won’t accept the gateway.
If I try to statically enter the IP addresses with a subnet of /16 it works, but anything on the 58.28.x.x range is not accessible - like my ISPs DNS servers and VoIP servers for example.. 58.28.4.2
So I’m stuck with double NATing at the moment, this is not ideal so can anyone help me out?!
at&t is doing the same thing here. we temporarily got around the problem by assigning a gateway ip that was at the end of the current assigned ip range (x.x.x.254).
the MT will not accept the default dynamic route at&t assigns (it remains blue) because the default route is not in the same subnet as the dynamic ip.
we’re looking for a way to assign the default route to the physical interface regardless of what at&t sets as the gateway ip address.
nz_monkey is a Dlink DSL-502T Rev A in your collection? I’m currently on Telstra cable, but about to switch to Xnet Fusion (ADSL with VoIP) due to price / data allowances.
I have an Xtra DSL-502T Rev A5 (Gen I) still in shrink-wrap in the cupboard. I think that only the Gen II (Rev C) supports half-bridge mode though.
Do you have any experience with this ubiquitous modem/router?
Chris is the Dynalink an RTA020 or something newer?
Thanks for your reply. I now have Xnet Fusion.
I bought (before you replied) a Dlink DSL-502T GenII (Rev C5) that was $23 on Tardme still sealed (thanks Xtra!), and a Linksys SPA2102 for the VoIP line.
It seems to be connected fine, and Xnet even turned off interleaving, so pings are as low as 25ms, almost as good as my soon-to-be-disconnected cable connection.
At the moment MT box is still plugged into cable, and Dlink is doing routing for DSL.
Is it possible to use MT with a dynamic WAN IP? Obviously the interface can get a dynamic IP via a PPP, but what about DST-NAT entries? What do you enter for the destination address?
Maybe try discovering ethernet address of device and manually adding it to the ARP table on fixed address for example .254 and than assigning this address as gateway, because only ethernet address is important here not ip address.
Another way to do it is not to do half bridge at all.
Get a Speedtouch, and strip out the config via telnet until you have a phonebook enty that has the vpi/vci settings, and enable the pptp service on the router. (1)
Put an IP of 10.0.0.1 on your MT ethernet facing your router
make a pptp-client interface to 10.0.0.138 (old default IP of a speedtouch) using your DSL usercode and password
enable the pptp-client interface
do a /ip add pr and the router now has a realworld IP on it - no NAT at all
Works fine with anthing that will do a PPTP client - Linux, BSD etc.
(1) I had a rough 3rd hand explaination of how to do this given to me. I implemented waht I had been told and it just didn’t work (different speedtouch firmwares I think). So I had my MT PPTP client banging away trying to login in one window and a telnet into the speedtouch in another and just started removing more and more config. I removed “something” and the PPTP came up and I got my IP - been using that config ever since
Interesting Thread, I was stuck trying to get full bridge to work with PPPoE (even though the DSL did the connecting..) and found this! Fantastic, it works… sort of. I’m looking for some advice.
The problem I have is when I have two connections active..
Wireless connection with static IP
DSL connection (Orcon NZ) so as good as static.
I want to route certain traffic such as p2p across the DSL and keep the Wireless connection for QOS reasons (SIP, RTP, etc..) However.. It seems to quickly get complicated as I have a DMZ in the mix also and traffic marked there as “Other_Con” is deciding to try and go out the DSL connection, even through traffic from the DMZ is srcnat’d to a static IP on the Wireless connection. I thnk i’ve fixed part of this by sorting out my rule order, however, traffic is not routing out the DSL connection only coming in. Any ideas?
Silly me, I can just use the in interface option to not get traffic from the DMZ, however, now I’m unable to receive data on the second link. So i can send ptp traffic over the dsl, but it doesn’t come back… Any ideas?