Problem with Dude and 3 Network cards

I have a windows XP machine with 3 network cards installed running the Dude. Network 2 and 3 have subnet routers behind the main Mikrotik. Routes are set and when operating networks 2 and 3 on separate machines everything works fine. I would like to eliminate one of the machines and only use on Dude computer.

Network 1
Address 192.168.1.238
Netmask 255.255.255.0
Gateway 192.168.1.1

Network 2
Address 10.10.2.250
Netmask 255.255.255.0
Gateway 10.10.2.1

Network 3
Address 10.11.2.250
Netmask 255.255.255.0

The problem that I am having is that Network 2 and 3 get confused on which Gateway to use is my assumption. If I unplug Network 2 then Network 3 starts working if I plug Network 2 back in then Network 2 works again and Network 3 stops working. What stops working is that I can not get to any clients in the subnets. 10.10.2.49 is a 750UP and the addresses are 10.10.21.X, Subnets in Network 3 are located at 10.11.2.48 and use 10.11.61.X, 10.11.62.X etc.

Any answer to solving this problem???

Thanks, Mike

you should not have 2 default routes. Route the net’s you have between the correct Interface. (make sure it has less metric than Your default route)

I’m not sure what you mean by default route. What determines a default route and where is it set?

The gateway is the default route. You have 3 default routes but only one of them has the lowest metric. On your windows server in a cmd prompt type “route print”. Find 0.0.0.0 with the lowest metric and that is the network card all your traffic is taking.

Since 10.11.61.x is not “connected” the route to it is through 10.11.2.250 but your route to 0.0.0.0 has the lowest cost and is through 192.168.1.1 the packet that is supposed to be sent to 10.11.61.x is going out the wrong interface and never gets to the correct network.

Good luck,
Lebowski

just remove Gateway from the Interface not pointing to internet. I supppose its the 10 nets. (juste have one Gateway)


my dude routes:

Network Destination        Netmask          Gateway       Interface  Metric
        0.0.0.0          0.0.0.0    xx.xxx.57.253    xx.xxx.57.254    100
       10.0.0.0        255.0.0.0     192.168.65.1   192.168.65.240     15
  xx.xxx.57.252  255.255.255.252         On-link     xx.xxx.57.254    306
  xx.xxx.57.254  255.255.255.255         On-link     xx.xxx.57.254    306
  xx.xxx.57.255  255.255.255.255         On-link     xx.xxx.57.254    306
      127.0.0.0        255.0.0.0         On-link         127.0.0.1    306
      127.0.0.1  255.255.255.255         On-link         127.0.0.1    306
127.255.255.255  255.255.255.255         On-link         127.0.0.1    306
     172.16.0.0      255.255.0.0     192.168.65.1   192.168.65.240     15
    192.168.0.0      255.255.0.0     192.168.65.1   192.168.65.240     15
   192.168.65.0    255.255.255.0         On-link    192.168.65.240    266
 192.168.65.240  255.255.255.255         On-link    192.168.65.240    266
 192.168.65.255  255.255.255.255         On-link    192.168.65.240    266
      224.0.0.0        240.0.0.0         On-link         127.0.0.1    306
      224.0.0.0        240.0.0.0         On-link    192.168.65.240    266
      224.0.0.0        240.0.0.0         On-link     xx.xxx.57.254    306
255.255.255.255  255.255.255.255         On-link         127.0.0.1    306
255.255.255.255  255.255.255.255         On-link    192.168.65.240    266
255.255.255.255  255.255.255.255         On-link     xx.xxx.57.254    306

You see that the default route (Gateway.. or 0.0.0.0) have 100 . The 192,172 and 10 net’s have 15. Then the 15 metric is prioritised before 100 who is the default Gateway. This say something like. If traffic is not going to 172,192 or 10 nets, og to default.

Thanks for the help. This almost works. The 10.10.2.X network has a 750UP at 10.10.2.49 and all the clients are at 10.10.21.X. These are the only clients that I can’t ping and therefor the Dude does not see them. If I give 10.11.2.X a higher metric then the 10.10.21.X works but the entire 10.11.2.X network goes red.
NETS.JPG

OK I got it. I was talking with a friend about this and after looking at the “route print” we got currious about how to control the destination that is shown. He Google "Windows destination route and came up with this link http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/sag_tcpip_pro_addstaticroute.mspx?mfr=true . It seems that you can set routes in your computer just like you would in a router and it soved all of the problems. The command is like this.

route add 10.10.71.0 mask 255.255.255.0 10.10.2.1 metric 25 -p

The -p makes it persistent and get written into the registry and you don’t need to fool with it anymore.

Thanks for all the help, it let to a path where the solution was found.

Mike

Yep route print is awesome, nice to see you got what you want.

Yep. the Routing table you printed, have to much defaults (0.0.0.0/0)